[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Swprograms] Fwd: Be first to hear BBC World Service's new sound
- Subject: Re: [Swprograms] Fwd: Be first to hear BBC World Service's new sound
- From: John Figliozzi <jfiglio1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 15:51:43 -0400
I will say this. At one time, the BBCWS really had a distinctive
"sound" and style. The minute I tuned them in (and this was on
receivers of old that didn't have the convenience of digital readout;
you had to actually listen for the station) I knew it was the BBC
without the benefit of jingles, IDs, signature tunes, etc.
Over the past half decade or more, even when I tune in the BBCWS on a
digital readout receiver, I have doubts about what I'm listening to
and need to wait a while to confirm that it is the BBC. So much for
their *branding* efforts over the recent past (at least as far as
this particular "focus group" is concerned).
Of course, on my Sirius and XM receivers, I know it's the BBC because
the display tells me so.
John Figliozzi
On Sep 20, 2007, at 2:19 PM, Sandy Finlayson wrote:
> I'm sure your analysis is correct Richard. It is another example
> of out
> with the old and in with the politically correct vanilla. My main
> point is that I don't think these new tunes will connect with
> people in
> the same way the old ones did.
>
> Sandy
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Mr. Sandy Finlayson
> Philadelphia, PA
>
> 'Nothing makes a man more reverent than a library'
> Sir Winston Churchill
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: swprograms-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:swprograms-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Richard Cuff
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 2:16 PM
> To: Shortwave programming discussion
> Subject: Re: [Swprograms] Fwd: Be first to hear BBC World Service's
> new
> sound
>
> "Lilli-whatever" has a martial, imperial history in its use on the WS,
> and I am sure the thinking is purposefully to soften the sound
> somewhat.
>
> I would imagine focus group testing on this type of change must be
> agonizing -- given the diversity of world cultures, how would one ever
> reach consensus on the appropriate "sound" for the BBC?
>
> I am not "right-brained" enough to be able to add value to that type
> of process, I'm afraid...
>
> Richard
>
> On 9/20/07, Sandy Finlayson <sfinlayson@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The new tones sound very 'vanilla' to me. Gone are the days when the
>> distinctive Lillibulero could be recognized as 'THE' BBC WS
> identifier.
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Swprograms mailing list
> Swprograms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/swprograms
>
> To unsubscribe: Send an E-mail to
> swprograms-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe, or visit the
> URL shown above.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Swprograms mailing list
> Swprograms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/swprograms
>
> To unsubscribe: Send an E-mail to swprograms-request@hard-core-
> dx.com?subject=unsubscribe, or visit the URL shown above.
_______________________________________________
Swprograms mailing list
Swprograms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/swprograms
To unsubscribe: Send an E-mail to swprograms-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe, or visit the URL shown above.