Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] Re: WBAL is better now

["Neil Kazaross" <neilkaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

If your are getting WBAL that strong and have issues with WTAM's IBOC..all I 
can say is WOW..and let WBAL know.

73 KAZ
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Harms" <philcobill@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <am@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 5:39 PM
Subject: [NRC-AM] Re: WBAL is better now


> Barry, this is what that site returned. Interestingly, WCBM has a
> stronger signal according to the site.
>
> WCBM-N 81.2 dBu  11.51 mV/m
> WBAL-N 79.8 dBu   9.79 mV/m
>
> Bill
>
> Barry McLarnon wrote:
>
>> Bill, I'm curious to know what the field strength of WBAL is at your 
>> location.
>> Please go to http://www.v-soft.com/ZipSignal/default.htm, enter your zip 
>> code, and see what it tells you for WBAL.
>>
>> For anyone else who is experiencing IBOC interference on local 
>> (groundwave) signals, please try the above service and let us know what 
>> the calculated field strength is, along with some description of the 
>> severity of the interference.  The field strength at your location could 
>> be a *very* useful addition to the report that you send to the affected 
>> station.
>>
>> Barry
>>
>
> -- 
> Bill Harms
> Elkridge, Maryland
>
> Check out the Spokane Radio History Pages
> http://spokaneradio.philcobill.com
>
> and the Spokane Radio Tower Pages
> http://spokanetowers.philcobill.com
>
>
> The 28th Edition of the AM Radio Log is now shipping!
> Get yours Today at http://www.nrcdxas.org
> Same great features and the same low price to club members.
> ==============================================
>
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.487 / Virus Database: 
> 269.13.25/1018 - Release Date: 9/19/2007 3:59 PM
>
> 

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx