Re: [IRCA] WBAL is better now

[Bill Harms <philcobill@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Barry, this is what that site returned. Interestingly, WCBM has a
stronger signal according to the site.

WCBM-N 81.2 dBu  11.51 	mV/m
WBAL-N 79.8 dBu   9.79 	mV/m

Bill

Barry McLarnon wrote:

> Bill, I'm curious to know what the field strength of WBAL is at your location.
> Please go to http://www.v-soft.com/ZipSignal/default.htm, enter your zip code, 
> and see what it tells you for WBAL.
> 
> For anyone else who is experiencing IBOC interference on local (groundwave) 
> signals, please try the above service and let us know what the calculated 
> field strength is, along with some description of the severity of the 
> interference.  The field strength at your location could be a *very* useful 
> addition to the report that you send to the affected station.
> 
> Barry
> 

-- 
Bill Harms
Elkridge, Maryland

Check out the Spokane Radio History Pages
http://spokaneradio.philcobill.com

and the Spokane Radio Tower Pages
http://spokanetowers.philcobill.com

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx