[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] WBAL is better now
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] WBAL is better now
- From: Barry McLarnon <bdm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 12:42:06 -0400
On Thursday 20 September 2007 04:29, Bill Harms wrote:
> In all fairness I have to report that WBAL seems to be faring a bit
> better now (9/20 0420) There is not as much hiss when I have WBAL with
> the strongest; it is just barely detectable now. I am sure that this has
> to do with the signal strength of the offending station.
>
> Or are the stations playing games and something was out of adjustment?
Probably just variations in propagation, though it's entirely possible that
some stations are doing tests with variable digital power levels.
Bill, I'm curious to know what the field strength of WBAL is at your location.
Please go to http://www.v-soft.com/ZipSignal/default.htm, enter your zip code,
and see what it tells you for WBAL.
For anyone else who is experiencing IBOC interference on local (groundwave)
signals, please try the above service and let us know what the calculated
field strength is, along with some description of the severity of the
interference. The field strength at your location could be a *very* useful
addition to the report that you send to the affected station.
Barry
--
Barry McLarnon VE3JF Ottawa, ON
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx