[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] 990
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] 990
- From: Barry McLarnon <bdm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 13:27:07 -0500
On Monday 02 January 2006 01:59, Scott Fybush wrote:
> And 990's not the only Montreal signal that's more challenging here
> than it used to be. When 690 was still CBF and using the mighty
> half-wave tower at Brossard, it was a fairly easy daytime catch here.
> As CINW, operating from the much shorter towers at Kahnawake (the old
> CIQC 600 site), it's nonexistent by day and nowhere near as imposing
> at night as it used to be.
If I may pick a nit, it's CINF, not CINW, on 690. CINW is of course on
940.
I'm not sure how their signal would compare with the old CBF here (about
115 miles away), but it certainly is still formidable!
Cheers,
Barry
--
Barry McLarnon VE3JF Ottawa, ON
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx