Re: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA TP's for 11-25... Deep Sleep
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA TP's for 11-25... Deep Sleep



>
> Hi Gary,
>

 Did you catch JOCR this morning on 558? They were in 1525-1535 UTC for me
over here in "East Puyallup", at about a 7 on the 10 scale. I noted very
little else, though. 738 was in weakly but I couldn't tell if it was Taiwan
or Tahiti.

Guy Atkins
Puyallup, WA
http://fivebelow.squarespace.com



Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:33:45 EST
> From: D1028Gary@xxxxxxx
> To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA TP's for 11-25... Deep Sleep
> Message-ID: <cec.69b4036b.383ec479@xxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
> Hello All,
>
> The morning propagation had the TP's in the usual recent weak condition
> prior to 1515, but this morning very few of them managed to rejuvenate
> themselves.
>
> Unlike yesterday, there was no real boost across the band around 1520, only
>  a few weird fade-ins by certain stations like 675-Vietnam (also noted by
> John).  Vietnam came in at a decent level around 1520 with a co-channel,
> but
> there was  too much domestic splatter from 670 and 680 to dig out the
> co-channel's identity  (I was hoping for the NHK1 reported by Nick
> recently, but
> it could just as well  have been Hohot, heard many times already).
>
> 594-JOAK and 603-HLSA both came up to decent audio around 1530, but neither
>  one had any co-channels with them during this mediocre session. There was
> no boost at all to the upper band this morning, and any hope of good audio
> on  1494 kHz (like yesterday) was gone by 1535. 1503-JOUK had a moderate
> carrier at  1525, but never came close to the decent NHK1 audio heard
> yesterday. In general,  it was a very forgettable morning.
>
> 73, Gary DeBock
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx