[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Swprograms] Digital radio article in USA Today
- Subject: Re: [Swprograms] Digital radio article in USA Today
- From: Richard Cuff <rdcuff@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:34:37 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=l3/TXO7MTskDid5OYBeJBKfMCcdoEMpYA0zx+s8igcfvv8EapmKMHqdI656PNV4LPGJzaE6s7xF27LkhKSZBgm7gNGCI+cWKN/ziNlu7nktnSI+yfIjr/RCJuHjpgfPYQbfZA6L0o6I+w6ViOTKeSerVx6zaiSzLVHT4K+LFcYM=
/cynic on
WLW is probably the exception vs. the rule when it comes to caring
about skywave propagation -- I would think most clear channel (lower
case) stations probably don't care anymore. They just don't want
local interference.
/cynic off
Richard Cuff / Allentown, PA
On 8/25/05, Joseph Buch <joseph.buch@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Yes. The early tests with WOR and WLW did demonstrate that the adjacent channel was interfered with by the digital sidebands. That is why the FCC has not authorized IBOC (In Band Off Channel) operation at night. They are trying now to assess if any of the stations care about their skywave coverage anymore. I think stations like WLW which carry the "Truckin' Bozo" show for truck drivers would lose some ad revenue (truck stops, chewing tobacco, etc.) if skywave coverage was limited to any degree by adjacent channel IBOC sidebands.
_______________________________________________
Swprograms mailing list
Swprograms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://dallas.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/swprograms
To unsubscribe: Send an E-mail to swprograms-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe, or visit the URL shown above.