[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] more same stations, different receiving setups



Hi Jim, 
 
<<<ÂÂ Chuck's quick set-up at the cliffs was the stuff of Olympic standards.ÂÂ >>> 
 
Chuck does have some serious ocean cliff DXing experience, Jim. He has been a "Cliffhanger" almost as long as me. 
 
Gary 
ÂÂ 

----- Original Message -----

From: "James Renfrew" <jim.renfrew@xxxxxxxxx> 
To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America" <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 11:58:08 PM 
Subject: Re: [IRCA] more same stations, different receiving setups 

Nothing quite like rolling out a thousand feet or more of beverage through 
dense pine and swamp along the rocky Newfoundland coast. ÂEven more fun 
with "weather". 

Chuck's quick set-up at the cliffs was the stuff of Olympic standards. ÂJim 
Renfrew 
On Jul 14, 2016 02:52, <d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 

> Chuck - 
> 
> My original comment about the broadband loop's "extended" setup time was 
> in comparison to Nick's active whip setup, or a single FSL setup. Whenever 
> you need to set up two secure vertical supports and adjust a control to 
> optimize F/B ratio you are likely to take more time than erecting a whip 
> antenna, or plopping a large FSL on a "Walker" base. ÂOn the other hand I 
> agree that the setup time of your ocean cliff broadband loops would be 
> "trivial" in comparison to setting up something like a large DKAZ, long 
> beverage or QDFA at sea level. 
> 
> Gary 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> 
> From: "Chuck Hutton" <charlesh3@xxxxxxx> 
> To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America" < 
> irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 10:48:32 PM 
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] more same stations, different receiving setups 
> 
> Gary - 
> 
> 
> Your original comment was that the loops required extended setup time. I 
> hope you'll now agree the flag / corner fed loop has trivial setup times. 
> 
> 
> Chuck 
> 
> 
> ________________________________ 
> From: IRCA <irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of 
> d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx <d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
> Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2016 5:42 AM 
> To: America, Mailing 
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] more same stations, different receiving setups 
> 
> Chuck: 
> 
> Thanks for your comments. 
> 
> <<< Â My flag kit can be installed in total darkness in 10-12 minutes, as 
> Jim Renfrew witnessed a few weeks ago. There can't be much difference 
> between that and setup of your FSL Walkers (homage to Star Wars). Â >>> 
> 
> Actually a single large FSL can be set up on its PVC base (a.k.a. 
> "Walker") within about 2 minutes, and was done so a couple of times at the 
> cliff (Saturday and Monday mornings) resulting quick loggings of 1017-Tonga 
> upon first arrival at the site. The FSL setup only takes serious time who 
> you deploy four of them, complete with PVC bases, PVC radio holder frames, 
> plastic totes, Ultralight radios, digital recorders and connecting wires. 
> Hiroo Nakagawa was amazed at this extravaganza, and after watching it for a 
> few minutes did the complete disassembly for all four PVC "Walkers" on the 
> last day. 
> 
> 73, Gary 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> 
> From: "Chuck Hutton" <charlesh3@xxxxxxx> 
> To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America" < 
> irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 4:43:13 PM 
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] more same stations, different receiving setups 
> 
> Gary: 
> 
> 
> I agree about the FSL's. 
> 
> 
> My flag kit can be installed in total darkness in 10-12 minutes, as Jim 
> Renfrew witnessed a few weeks ago. There can't be much difference between 
> that and setup of your FSL Walkers (homage to Star Wars). 
> 
> 
> The deltas / loops are really not big for the cliffs. You could put 10 of 
> Tom's deltas in Rockworks 4 if you had supports. I could make my 18x18 flag 
> 6 times longer if desired. 
> 
> 
> And my jury is still out on the active whip after listening to the 
> recordings of weaker stations. Nick may have to be a big spender and go for 
> the 6' or 10' element. I'd be curious about using the standard 102' cb whip 
> which should mount onto the AMRAD unit. 
> 
> 
> Chuck 
> 
> 
> ________________________________ 
> From: IRCA <irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of 
> d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx <d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 9:10 PM 
> To: America, Mailing 
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] more same stations, different receiving setups 
> 
> 
> The large (for the cliff) broadband loops used by Tom and Chuck are 
> superior performers for relatively sensitive investigation of the entire MW 
> band, but do require some extended setup time (in comparison to your active 
> whip and the FSL's), and have some weather vulnerabilities (in comparison 
> to your active whip). 
> 
> Your active whip provides generally good performance in covering the 
> entire band, and excels in quick setup and weather survivability (as we all 
> found out on the "day of the drowned rats"). 
> 
> The FSL's do require manual tuning (with the related weather hassles), but 
> they provide unexcelled low band performance, extremely quick setup and 
> have a huge advantage in performance for the compact size (they can be set 
> up in one square yard of flat space). 
> 
> Of course, all of these antennas get a DU-DXing performance boost when 
> they are deployed at an ocean cliff site, with its solid-rock attenuation 
> of back-side domestic signals and transoceanic signal boost. Related to 
> this, I hope that you will post the results of your July 11th comparison of 
> the ocean cliff propagation with that of the sea-level campsite nearby (in 
> which the Rockwork 4 DU-DXing results kicked those of the sea-level site 
> "off of the cliff"). 
> 
> 73, Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA) 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> IRCA mailing list 
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca 
> IRCA Info Page - montreal.kotalampi.com< 
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca> 
> montreal.kotalampi.com 
> Your email address: Your name (optional): You may enter a privacy password 
> below. This provides only mild security, but should prevent others from 
> messing with ... 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Be sure to register now for the Joint DX Convention 
> Kansas City, September 9 to 11. ÂHotel space is filling up. 
> Registration info: 
> http://www.nrcdxas.org 
> 
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers 
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org 
> 
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> IRCA mailing list 
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca 
> 
> Be sure to register now for the Joint DX Convention 
> Kansas City, September 9 to 11. ÂHotel space is filling up. 
> Registration info: 
> http://www.nrcdxas.org 
> 
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers 
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org 
> 
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> IRCA mailing list 
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca 
> 
> Be sure to register now for the Joint DX Convention 
> Kansas City, September 9 to 11. ÂHotel space is filling up. 
> Registration info: 
> http://www.nrcdxas.org 
> 
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers 
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org 
> 
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> IRCA mailing list 
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca 
> 
> Be sure to register now for the Joint DX Convention 
> Kansas City, September 9 to 11. ÂHotel space is filling up. 
> Registration info: 
> http://www.nrcdxas.org 
> 
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers 
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org 
> 
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> 
> 
_______________________________________________ 
IRCA mailing list 
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca 

Be sure to register now for the Joint DX Convention 
Kansas City, September 9 to 11. ÂHotel space is filling up. 
Registration info: 
http://www.nrcdxas.org 


Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers 

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org 

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Be sure to register now for the Joint DX Convention
Kansas City, September 9 to 11.  Hotel space is filling up.
Registration info:
http://www.nrcdxas.org


Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx