Re: [IRCA] IBOC/analog reception comparisons.

["Kevin R. in Gilbert, AZ" <amfmdx@xxxxxxxxx>]

> I disagree...Iboc is a subject that has affected (or will) all of to
> some degree or another.

AMEN. Its THE topic because whether or not you want to deal with it, we
DXers are in the tunnel, standing on the tracks and a 125 car coal train is
heading towards us at 88 miles per hour. We have to figure out how to deal
with it or DXing is history.

It needs to be talked about and openly FROM A DXERS STANDPOINT. We need to
figure out how to DX it or DX around it.

> I'm a co list owner of two other dx lists (the WTFDA list and its
> adjunct MW list) and we have had many spirited IBOC debates that have
> never reached the noise level that it has here on this and the NRC lists
> with many of the same members with one exception.

There was one fellow on the NRC list that caused this same problem when
discussing IBOC. When he came to the IRCA list, the same problem occurred.

I run ABDX and we pass lots and lots of messages daily. We openly discuss
IBOC and there is never an issue there. We even get a little boisterous
about it but there is no sacred cow to be protected so there is no rancor as
we had here. 

Keep IBOC open. We HAVE to figure out how to deal with it or this hobby is
done. 

Kevin

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx