[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] IBOC/analog reception comparisons.
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] IBOC/analog reception comparisons.
- From: "Russ Johnson" <k3pi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 18:26:54 -0800
Okay, finally - the essence of it. Thank you.
It's just marketing...creating the "cool factor." Why not save a lot of time, effort, money and anguish? Just give analog radio a "cool" new name. How about listen to WAR (Wireless Analogue Radio)...make it sound European, verrrry cool.
As far as that goes, "Terrestrial" sounds pretty neat-o spiffy too.
Or, WXYZ brings you this program in "Pure AG".
Give the marketing boys a million bucks to give radio a cool new name and be done with it.
There might even be words or labels out there that are cooler than "digital."
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "David Gleason" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:58:01 -0800
>The key issue is that carrying an iPod is cool, while a (analog) radio is not. iPod = cool. Digital = Cool. Make radio digital, it is cooler than it was and moves up in image among entertainment choices.
___________________________________________________________
$0 Web Hosting with up to 200MB web space, 1000 MB Transfer
10 Personalized POP and Web E-mail Accounts, and much more.
Signup at www.doteasy.com
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx