Re: [IRCA] Alberta TP/DUs for 6 Sep 2012

[neilkaz <neilkaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Good to NZ I can believe. As I've allready mentioned and as Tim from MI observed, yesterday was stunning here in the midwest. Unfortunately 1035 is pounded here as my Polish local comes on at 6 am (1100) whether it is supposed to or not. When I lived in ME in the early 80's, one morning 1035 was almost audio strength off the back end of my TA Bevs so I know they get out!

Re: 684, I had audio for about 5 minutes at my sunrise and just after it the song sounds contemporary christian so I strongly think Rhema. Tim's had a couple strong carriers on 657, but mine have been considerably weaker and would have to improve lots for audio. There's also what seems to be a second DU accented audio on my recordings of 702 and a big fast SAH so I suspect that was NZ also.

This morning would have been almost as good, but too many T-storms. 73 KAZ Barrington IL


-----Original Message-----
>From: Nigel Pimblett <nige2730@xxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Sep 6, 2012 10:59 PM
>To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: [IRCA] Alberta TP/DUs for 6 Sep 2012
>
>     Signals down from yesterday, with only the slightest of audio.  738 
>had the best signal, but the audio was too weak to be certain if it was 
>Australia or Tahiti.  I'm suspecting Tahiti, but my antenna doesn't 
>favour that direction, so it's very rarely I get them with much signal. 
>  Other than that the only audio was faint traces on 1035.   The 
>evidence is entirely circumstantial, but given that 1035 audio, and the 
>fact that the strongest carriers without audio were on 657, 684, and 
>1008, it appears that conditions favoured New Zealand over Australia 
>this morning at this location.  Regular Aussie freqs like 702, 774, and 
>891 weren't doing much.
>
>73,
>
>Nigel Pimblett
>Dunmore, Alberta
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx