Re: [IRCA] FCC info on tone testers
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] FCC info on tone testers



> Similarly, how is it better or worse for one person to presume illegal
> activity based on clear and obvious willful interference and no
> identification as versus another person to presume that everything is
> legal based solely on one rather fragmented post claiming that was so.

I would also ask just what business any in here have to lodge a complaint?
Unless someone is hiding something, there isn't a person in here with any
legal standing to do so.  KDKA, sure.  A whole mess of 1610 TIS/HAR
operators, plus a Canadian station or two?  Absolutely.  A DXer?  No way.
So why do it?  Why put us in the foreground as a complaining party when we
have suffered no damages?

I said I'd shut up after my first reply, and I will.  Some things needed
clarifying..

Craig Healy
Providence, RI

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx