[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] Rockworks, Oregon Non-DX Report for Oct. 24th



Gary - 
 
We split up with the idea of comparing the 2 locations. We think 4 has horizon blockage from 300 degrees northward so might not give us some Asians. It does have a better "backscreen" cliff wall behind it.
 
Rockworks 2 has no horizon blockage towards Asia. But a bit more signal might leak in from behind with the less imposing cliff wall behind it.
 
Guy and I have a better impression of Asiatic reception from Rockworks  4 than you. Perhaps because we have been there in the fall (TP season) while your comments mention July lack of TPs.
 
Chuck
 
> Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 20:00:08 -0700
> From: dx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] Rockworks, Oregon Non-DX Report for Oct. 24th
> 
> Hi Gary, there were two of us at Rock works 2 and two of us at Rockworks 4.
> In fact, each location had a Flag or ALA100LN mast supported loop (50 or
> more feet in circumference) as well as one or more Wellbrook 1-meter active
> loops at each site.
> 
> Our results were the same at each turnout, no matter what antenna :^(
> 
> It's safe to say that it just wasn't a morning to set the log books on fire!
> 
> 73,
> 
> Guy Atkins
> Puyallup, WA
> DXing at the Rockworks cliffs near Manzanita, OR
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> 
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
 		 	   		  
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx