Re: [IRCA] Oregon Cliff (Rockwork 4) Ultralight DU's for 8-8 (Conclusion)

[d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx]

Thanks very much for your comments on 558-6WA, Nick. 
Actually this was pretty much a recording that I made for kicks at the very end of the session as DU propagation was crashing on other frequencies. I figured that it was the same 558 Aussie station that I had recorded earlier, but had not come up with any ID clues. Now I'm pretty sure that there were two different 558 Aussies involved-- one commercial one, and the 6WAÂLR network station. 
 
Tom, Chuck and I had another absolutely wacko session at the cliff this morning, with almost every Kiwi station managing potent signals at some point (although Australia was also in full play). Tom said he was "blown away" by the DU signals, and Chuck said he was glad that he stayed for a third day.ÂWe hope that you and Bruce can join us during next summer's wild sessions! 
 
Gary 
ÂÂÂ 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Nick Hall-Patch" <nhp@xxxxxxxx> 
To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America" <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent: Sunday, August 9, 2015 7:52:32 AM 
Subject: Re: [IRCA] Oregon Cliff (Rockwork 4) Ultralight DU's for 8-8 (Conclusion) 

Congratulations on 558 Gary. ÂYou and Bill Whitacre seem to be making 
this into a summertime logging (He heard it in July 2013 at Sans 
Souci apparently). Â I don't recall it had been heard for many years 
before then, and then it had been a "peak of the fall season" logging. 

best wishes, 

Nick 


At 07:59 09-08-15, you wrote: 
>Gary- 
> 
>At 1325 the music is clearly parallel to ABC on 612, 774 and 855 so 
>this must be Wagin, West Australia. Not a bad catch. I haven't 
>checked earlier files so maybe I have audio to prove the identity of 
>your 1312 recording. 
> 
>Chuck 
> 
> > Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2015 04:23:23 +0000 
> > From: d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> > To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > Subject: [IRCA] Oregon Cliff (Rockwork 4) Ultralight DU's for 
> 8-8 Â Â (Conclusion) 
> > 
> > Hello All, 
> > 
> > Yesterday's torrid Kiwi propagation didn't repeat for a second 
> day, temporarily making Chuck, Tom and I wonder if the session 
> might turn out to be somewhat of a letdown. But around 1300 the 
> Cliff delivered interesting DX as usual, with several low-band 
> Australians providing some excitement for those willing to track 
> them down and check parallels. 
> > 
> > As we gathered at the deserted turnoff in total darkness at 1145 
> the hot topic of conversation was yesterday's awesome propagation, 
> and how it played out in our individual results. Chuck had far more 
> variety than I had noticed, with both Kiwis and Aussies unusually 
> vibrant for him (especially the long-running ads from 1566-3NE, as 
> in his posted recording). Tom also had been extremely impressed 
> with the propagation, and we all hoped for something like a repeat 
> this morning. At first listen on 531 kHz at 1146 it looked 
> promising, with 531-4KZ at an S7 level without any PI competition. 
> Unfortunately the increasing daylight brought no repeat of 
> yesterday's fantastic propagation, and we all wondered it the 
> session might turn out to offer a routine mix of the Aussie and 
> Kiwi big guns. Around 1300 the low-band propagation to Australia 
> began to improve dramatically, however, and before long a mystery 
> Oz station on 558 began to take over the frequency. This was 
> followed by an Aussie 
> Â mix on 585, with both 7RN (// 576) and 2WEB (not // to 576 or 
> 603) taking turns dominating the frequency. 531-4KZ also came up 
> dramatically at this time, and 567-4JK started giving a weakened 
> RNZ some serious competition. Chuck and Tom didn't seem aware of 
> the Aussie low-band opening at the time (1300-1330) but after 
> hearing about it soon started checking several frequencies. This 
> was the first time I had ever received any Oz station on 558 at 
> this cliff, and the first appearance of 585-2WEB here for a couple 
> of years. This was also the first time that 585-7RN had been ID'ed 
> by the 576 // at this cliff; a previous 585 Australian recording 
> had been determined to be 7RN after 2WEB's David Sharp (an 
> Ultralight Radio Yahoo Group member) listened to it and said that 
> the format didn't match that of 2WEB (there is no other real 
> possibility on 585 from eastern Australia). 
> > 
> > 531 Â4KZ ÂInnisfail, Australia  Good strength in the predawn 
> darkness at 1146 with local commercial ad string 
> > https://app.box.com/s/4cglto8uzff7zymehxiw0bkx8wha5rtl 
> > 
> > 558 ÂUnID-Australian  The primary mystery of the morning-- a 
> fairly strong Australian station (not Fiji nor the 
> American-accented Radio Sport) dominating with local ads at 1311. 
> Any suggestions would be welcome! 
> > https://app.box.com/s/88afpevke1af7bffg0fy6ap6m1l8e2je 
> > 
> > 558 ÂUnID-Australian  Another recording of a mystery 558 station 
> in Oz running an apparent talk program. Unknown whether this is the 
> same station as linked above or not, but any identity suggestions 
> would be welcome. 
> > https://app.box.com/s/n6qmnoclak9g7ontq4b1t4eb3fpnt187 
> > 
> > 576 Â2RN ÂSydney, Australia  RN network big gun playing jazz 
> music at 1319; used to confirm reception of the 585-7RN // at 1322 
> > https://app.box.com/s/0qlp1ddc3z4erzyew26os74iid8awh3q 
> > 
> > 585 Â7RN ÂHobart, Australia  Tasmanian station playing jazz 
> music // 576 at 1322; only Tassie station to be received at the Cliff so far 
> > https://app.box.com/s/vuv7zubn9780zaszxyro8twk6eteo0ik 
> > 
> > 585 Â2WEB Â Bourke, Australia (presumed) Â Playing "The Lion 
> Sleeps Tonight" by the Tokens at fair strength over 7RN at 1320; 
> not // to 576 nor 603, leaving no other real possibility (at least 
> until Program Director David Sharp says otherwise :-) 
> > https://app.box.com/s/ux40moc0k3l3nohximyrix8bcsp6lq71 
> > 
> > 73 and Good DX, 
> > Gary DeBock (DXing at the Rockwork 4 ocean cliff near Manzanita, OR) 
> > 7.5" loopstick C.Crane Skywave Ultralight + 17" and 12" 
> DXpedition FSL antennas 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________ 
> > IRCA mailing list 
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca 
> > 
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of 
> the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the 
> opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers 
> > 
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org 
> > 
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > 
> 
>_______________________________________________ 
>IRCA mailing list 
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca 
> 
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
>original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of 
>the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers 
> 
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org 
> 
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 


_______________________________________________ 
IRCA mailing list 
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca 

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers 

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org 

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx