Re: [IRCA] Updated frequency offset for 1017 Tonga?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] Updated frequency offset for 1017 Tonga?



Bruce, Guy,

Thanks for confirming my suspicion regarding the Tonga frequency offset.
I hope this updated information makes its way into the MW offset list.

Poor conditions here this morning as evidenced by a very weak 738
carrier during sunrise enhancement.  1017 was completely absent.

73,
-Tim

On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 21:58 -0700, Bruce Portzer wrote:
> Tim
> 
> I went back and checked my Winradio files.  Assuming KOMO is exactly on 
> 1000, then Tonga measures on 1017.008.
> 
> I was also able to receive a weaker DU about 8 Hz below Tonga, but I 
> don't know what it is.
> 
> Good luck getting pursuing  TPs from Michigan.
> 
> Bruce
> 
> 
> On 7/25/2013 16:22, kilokat7 wrote:
> > I suspect the 1017 carrier that was teasing me this morning may have
> > been Tonga.  With the Perseus, the strongest of the two carriers that I
> > measured at 1034 UTC was centered on 1017.008 kHz, while a weaker one
> > appears dead-on 1017.000.  Can any western DXers confirm if Tonga is
> > +0.008?
> >
> > I've enjoyed all the reports and audio snippets coming in from the west
> > coast.  Keep them coming!
> >
> > 73,
> > Tim Tromp
> > West Michigan
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> 
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx