Re: [IRCA] weak TA carriers in Victoria BC

[Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Chuck.   If I can't hear the DX at least I can dream about it, 
based on the carrier frequency.   Extreme minimalist DXing, indeed.

best wishes,

Nick

...as for TA's....nothing tonight that I can hear.

At 02:33 23-11-11, you wrote:
> Nick -
>
> On 10 Nov, Ecca was on 1268.977 so surely that is your carrier.
>
> As to the guy on the low side of 1575, this was noted at Grayland in 
> October. I have a few noisy seconds of audio that seem English so I 
> suppose it was one of the AFN stations other than Misawa which is 
> right on 1575.
>
>
> Chuck
>
> On 11/21/2011 9:36 PM, Nick Hall-Patch wrote:
> > Thanks Mauno.   I'll post this over at mwoffsets along with your 
> > observations.  I've only ever identified DLF on this channel in our 
> > evenings, so the possibility of Canary Islands is intriguing.
> >
> > best wishes,
> >
> > Nick
> >
> >
> > At 22:43 21-11-11, you wrote:
> > > 21.11.2011 6:51, Nick Hall-Patch kirjoitti:
> > > > Again, just weak TA carriers this evening in Victoria BC
> > > >
> > > > 1269 (4 carriers; strongest one at 1268.974 (nothing in mwoffsets list)
> > >
> > > Here in Finland this faded in around 1830 and out between 
> > > 0500-0600, which might fit best to R. ECCA from Canary Islands. 
> > > Maybe someone on mwoffsets list would know? Iran today as low as 1268.65 kHz.
> > >
> > > 73, Mauno
> > >
> > > > best wishes,
> > > >
> > > > Nick
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > IRCA mailing list
> > > > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> > > >
> > > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of 
> > > > the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the 
> > > > opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> > > >
> > > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> > > >
> > > > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > IRCA mailing list
> > > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> > >
> > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of 
> > > the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the 
> > > opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> > >
> > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> > >
> > > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of 
> > the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the 
> > opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of 
> the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx