[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] 1575 multiple carriers; was: Re: TP for 19 Nov 2011 from Victoria: down compared to the 17th and 18th
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] 1575 multiple carriers; was: Re: TP for 19 Nov 2011 from Victoria: down compared to the 17th and 18th
- From: Walter Salmaniw <canswl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 01:29:32 +0000
Hi, Nick. Good to hear from you again. Farda was always spot on frequency
in past years, and usually very easy to differentiate. No longer, perhaps?
......Walt
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Finally got to check another recording Walt, from a week earlier, 12
> November. At 1500UT, 1575kHz almost seemed to have more carriers than
> stations listed in PAL..
>
> 1574.9383
> 1574.9816
> 1574.9898
> 1574.9944
> 1574.9983
> 1574.9991
> 1574.9999
> 1575.0002
> 1575.0007
> 1575.0014
> 1575.0030
> 1575.0328
>
> Probably about .3Hz error due to Doppler smearing, so I think your Perseus
> is set pretty accurately. Strongest were .9944 (VoA likely) and .0002,
> with .9816 a close contender (and that one signed off at 1500UT as well;
> nothing listed in PAL). Quite a mess...wonder if one of those was Farda
> which is supposed to be spot on channel, and in darkness at that time.
>
> best wishes,
>
> Nick
>
>
>
>
>
> At 04:21 21-11-11, you wrote:
>
>> Nick, those carriers were measured around 15:00 UTC. What, VOA not bang
>> on? Interesting!........Walt
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 5:36 AM, Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > Mauno Ritola noted the following on this list 4 October 2011:
>> >
>> > Hi Nick,
>> >> you are right, VOA has drifted 2 Hz down to 1575.995 kHz. Farda UAE is
>> >> right on 1575.000 kHz. Iran 1575.022 kHz.
>> >> Bubble jammer 1574.24 kHz. Plus about a dozen of UNID carriers.
>> >>
>> >> 73, Mauno
>> >>
>> >
>> > I'm not at home right now, so am depending on SDR recordings from 18
>> > November, Walt, but I believe that VoA is now 1574.9940 (which you
>> noted,
>> > and was the strongest signal here), while the other major signal on the
>> > recording I have is 1574.9389 (likely your .941) which is definitely
>> unID.
>> > The others were too weak on that date to really note (maybe one on
>> > 1574.9995...). What time did you hear all those carriers?
>> >
>> > best wishes,
>> >
>> > Nick
>> >
>> >
>> > At 15:18 19-11-11, you wrote:
>> >
>> >> 1575: 6. I've noticed this one to have a wide peak for the last few
>> >> days,
>> >> so zoomed in with my Perseus. A real hodge podge of signals on
>> 1574.921,
>> >> .941, .994, .998, .999, and 1575.003. Nick could probably elaborate
>> more
>> >> with his superior set-up to measure the various carriers.
>> >> 1593: 7 level CNR1
>> >
>>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx