Re: [IRCA] TP for 19 Nov 2011 from Victoria: down compared to the 17th and 18th
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] TP for 19 Nov 2011 from Victoria: down compared to the 17th and 18th



Nick, those carriers were measured around 15:00 UTC.  What, VOA not bang
on?  Interesting!........Walt

On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 5:36 AM, Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Mauno Ritola noted the following on this list 4 October 2011:
>
>  Hi Nick,
>> you are right, VOA has drifted 2 Hz down to 1575.995 kHz. Farda UAE is
>> right on 1575.000 kHz. Iran 1575.022 kHz.
>> Bubble jammer 1574.24 kHz. Plus about a dozen of UNID carriers.
>>
>> 73, Mauno
>>
>
> I'm not at home right now, so am depending on SDR recordings from 18
> November, Walt, but I believe that VoA is now 1574.9940 (which you noted,
> and was the strongest signal here), while the other major signal on the
> recording I have is 1574.9389 (likely your .941)  which is definitely unID.
>   The others were too weak on that date to really note (maybe one on
> 1574.9995...).  What time did you hear all those carriers?
>
> best wishes,
>
> Nick
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> At 15:18 19-11-11, you wrote:
>
>> Conditions were down this morning, compared to the last two here in
>> Victoria, despite good solar indices.  For today, SF 144, A 1, K (12:00)
>> 0.
>>  No space weather.  I'll add the last two days as well below.  As always a
>> "6" unless otherwise noted.  Listened from 14:37 (and still trying at
>> 15:07
>> this morning):
>>
>> 529 (SQM) at 6
>> 594
>> 774:  7  NHK2
>> 828, 1557
>> 1566:  HLAZ at 7.5
>> 1575:  6.  I've noticed this one to have a wide peak for the last few
>> days,
>> so zoomed in with my Perseus.  A real hodge podge of signals on 1574.921,
>> .941, .994, .998, .999, and 1575.003.  Nick could probably elaborate more
>> with his superior set-up to measure the various carriers.
>> 1593:  7 level CNR1
>>
>> 18 Nov 2011   14:42 to 15:12.    SF 148, A 4, K (12:00) 0.  No space
>> weather.  An acceptable Asian morning with a modest dawn enhancement.
>>  Findings identical to Nick's DX Fishbarrel.
>>
>> 594:  7 level NHK1 at 15:11
>> 612
>> 693:  7 level with ++ splatter from CBC 690.  NHK2
>> 747
>> 774:  7 level NHK2
>> 828:  8 level NHK2
>> 972:  7 level KK
>> 1503, 1512, 1557
>> 1566:  8 level HLAZ at 15:11
>> 1575:  7 level
>> 1584, 1593.
>>
>> 17 Nov 2011  14:43 to 15:15   SF 142, A 4, K (12:00) 1  No space weather.
>>  Not as good as the 18th.  Nothing on the higher band, but perhaps a bit
>> better on the lower bands.
>>
>> 567
>> 594:  8 level NHK1 at 15:06
>> 603, 612 (late)
>> 747:  8 level NHK2 at 15:08
>> 774:  8 level NHK2 at 14:47
>> 819, 828
>> 972:  7 level KK at 15:09
>>
>>   That's it from a frosty Victoria.  No obvious dawn enhancement today
>> with 774 and 1566 only weakly there at 15:17 UTC this morning (the 19th).
>>  73,   Walt
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> IRCA mailing list
>> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/**mailman/listinfo/irca<http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca>
>>
>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>>
>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>>
>> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/**mailman/listinfo/irca<http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca>
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx