[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] The WJZ calls return to radio
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] The WJZ calls return to radio
- From: "Paul B. Walker, Jr." <walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 14:12:24 -0600
- Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx designates 72.14.176.152 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@xxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=pkarJ2x4DyWmv7iJsZSUzXlS+j/hCuV8E400cH0qYDU=; b=VO0IPxikHCcq0oCu0GPyxgUcFqDQhxBhe8bre03zb/iNklond/Rfv0SuhqeFC/8244 R5lCRwtcZpK2cGwVtWU3c0lvfkyMRQnzOrOzazwMqxW53OSFUemnOfW+1eilKrk3ca5c 1CafI6FoL2bUlbcT/biPxRj4zKaK/QU/7qQGM=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=KfMqaMe2iJ8vASq5x0rRRHG/J3OdeHpm2gug8p3Y2GuZISQnDz8ms1jVEvae2iOVfE p4XjzDDFGXkNwlY4FLRHKPf5f9BUu+0fjNOuqxIkTWLkXvOg/Fw5YYAtg7vwTK1WzbkL +EFA3E7GbdR3gk7Xg++DkWG7qZbMG6jomg9P0=
It's the fact they say "WJZ-AM" Baltimore.
AM is referred to as the "standard broadcast band" or something I think and
there is and never has been a -AM suffix. There IS a -FM Suffix.
Yeha, I KNOW I'm a nitpick about this... call it an obsession if you will,
lol
TECHNICALLY, an FCC inspector COULD issue them a Notice of Violation for
improperly IDing... I've heard of inspectors having an especially bad day
and just looking for any small thing to nail the station for.
Paul Walker
www.onairdj.com
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:08 PM, HASCALL, DAVID CIV DFAS <
DAVID.HASCALL@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Paul:
>
> For the uneducated or ill-informed (like me), tell me what is not leagl
> about the ID. Is it the fact that they said "WJZ-AM" and not WJZ? I
> heard "WJZ-AM Baltimore..." I thought call and city was all that was
> required. What do I know. :)
>
> I am guessing that one local FM broadcaster's "legal ID" is definitely
> NOT legal. It is 97.1 Hank FM / WLHK 97.1 Shelbyville-Indianapolis.
> There are two, that go a little somethin' like this: "This is WLHK
> Shoobydoo-Indianapolis, all my ex's live in Shelbyville," or "This is
> WLHK Shoobydoo-Indianapolis. We like Hank." Honestly, they are a
> pretty cool country station but the coolness should not used for a legal
> ID. :)
>
> 73,
> Dave in Indy
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 01:14:01 -0600
> From: "Paul B. Walker, Jr." <walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] The WJZ calls return to radio
> To: am@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
> <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-ID:
> <8bce0fe80811032314h6fe25977k3c9361e4ab41cfbb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252
>
> Only me and one other person on this list that I can think of would
> nitpick....
>
> But technically, that Legal ID isn't legal.
>
> Paul Walker
> www.onairdj.com
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:08 AM, Bill Harms <philcobill@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> > Here is a clip of WJZ 1300 in Baltimore that I just recorded. It is
> nice
> > to have a three-letter call return to AM.
> >
> > http://dxclipjoint.com/bill/01300-wjz-20081104-0200.mp3
> >
> > Enjoy!
> >
> > Bill Harms
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx