Re: [IRCA] Lipstick on a (Roast) Pig

[satya@xxxxxxxxxxxx]

To make things worse, my understanding is that the AM antennas supplied
with these units are the ineffective 4-inch, 5 turn loops you get with any
general stereo system.  The lack of signal coming through these antennas,
plus the relative paucity of HD stations on AM (as compared to FM), may
lead most buyers to simply ignore the fact that there is such a thing as
AM-HD.

For instance, if anyone here in the Seattle area buys a unit from QVC, the
nearest HD signals on AM are a sports station on 850 hkz, 30 miles away,
with 1 kW at night (that is stomped on by KOA in Denver) and a
poorly-engineered, generic talk blowtorch some 200 miles away (KEX
Portland) that probably won't decode anyway.  There simply isn't much
decodable HD to listen to around here, even if you have a Quantum Loop.

Once arbitron ratings come out for AM stations, and they realize how few
people are actually listening to their signal in HD, I would hope that
non-HD stations will think twice about investing in it themselves.

Kevin S.
Bainbridge Island, WA



> I couldn't agree with you more, Karl.  What a waste of time and money.
>
> This will be the first time I have watched QVC since I first got cable
in
> the '1980s.  I will even have to search to find what channel QVC is on
my
> cable box.  I wouldn't miss this for anything.
>
> It will be fascinating to see how they will promote HD radio.  let's
see!
> buy a radio that has formats that were rejected by regular over the air
radio because they didn't make money.  Yeah, that's it.
>
> How will they demonstrate the so called better quality signal when many
of
> the receivers are inferior in quality and performance.  This should be
good.
>
> One other thing, didn't the HD Radio Alliance promote this as technology
for
> a younger audience when they first began marketing HD?  Doesn't QVC attract
> an older group of people than they want to approach to buy the radios?
>
> Another example where they talk out of both sides of their mouth.
>
> Larry Stoler
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Karl J. Zuk" <karlzuk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 4:56 AM
> Subject: [IRCA] Lipstick on a (Roast) Pig
>
>
>
> From: http://insidemusicmedia.blogspot.com
>
>
>
>
>           HD on QVC -- Lipstick on a (Roast) Pig
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>       You've
> got to hand it to iBiquity, the firm that brought you HD radio over ten
years too late and "shrewd" enough to copyright the term HD while at the
same time saying it doesn't really mean "high definition".
>
> As
> the saying goes, you can't put lipstick on a pig, but somehow, iBiquity
has managed to get QVC to sell HD radios to its vast home shopping
network audience.
>
> Hope QVC has better luck than Radio Shack,
> Best Buy and Wal-Mart selling these empty radios. Hey, whatever
> happened to that hype? You can't easily find an HD radio in those stores
let alone a young salesperson to close the sale.
>
> Maybe
> QVC viewers can buy George Foreman's grill along with their HD radios so
that they can cook this pig because there are going to be a lot of
unhappy customers out there once they plug it in.
>
> In case you haven't heard "HD Radio broadcasting is sweeping the
country"
> according to iBiquity's web site.
> Did you know that HD is "available to over 80 percent of the
> population. More than 1,500 AM/FM stations are currently offering
subscription free digital content, including more than 600 HD2
> multicast stations offering unique formats and content".
>
> Wow, such a deal.  Let me guess.  You need to buy a new expensive radio,
right?
>
> Here's
> what iBiquity says, "All a consumer needs is a new HD Radio receiver;
the content is free. The radios are priced for everyone from under $100
from major mass-market retailers across the U.S. Virtually everyone can
experience the crystal-clear digital sound on AM and FM as well as the
broadcast-exclusive new FM channels".
>
> Those under $100 models
> must really sound good. iBiquity seems to have left out the expensive
$400 models. Just an oversight, I guess.
>
> This roast pig is getting me sick to my stomach.
>
> While
> some radio broadcasters are holding out hope that HD will energize the
declining radio industry, others are apparently thinking about their
options -- including unplugging their HD hardware and moving on to a
solution that actually holds promise -- say, the Internet.
>
> Let's imagine how QVC's customers are going to feel when they unpack
their
> HD radios and plug them in for the first time:
>
> 1.
> Where's the beef? (Sorry, this is a pig -- where's the pork?). Where's
all that exciting programming I was told would make the purchase price
all worthwhile? Do they file a class action suit, return the radios for
a refund or use their new less than $100 HD radios as antiques?
>
> 2.
> Where's the fidelity? K-Fed had more fidelity when he was married to
Britney than HD radio has now. Yes, it's better, but no -- not that much
better.  A Bose it's not.  Satellite radio it's not.   It's just not.
>
> 3.  When do these consumers figure out that you get what you pay for --
HD
> radio content is free.  Radio companies are waiting for them to buy
millions
> of new radios before they spend their
> precious money on new programming. Maybe this HD-QVC marketing marriage
will backfire and help sell satellite radios. At least satellite sounds
better, comes in cars and has hundreds of millions of dollars of
programming built into it.
>
> 4. Oh, and where's the "unique
> formats and content". I'm telling you, maybe I've been hanging around
the record industry too long but lawsuits would be flying for
> misrepresenting the product. Yes, I have been blinded by the Big Four
labels. (It appears the RIAA is going to take a class action suit that
could paralyze its efforts to sue the pants off music pirates -- if
successful.  I've got to stop thinking like a lawyer and start thinking
like
> the lowly program director that I have been proud to be).
>
> HD
> subchannels are really nothing that radio PDs can't program. They have
lots of ideas. Unfortunately, few companies are listening to their ideas
for the main terrestrial channels.
>
> That's why radio programming sucks.  It's that simple.
>
> Selling
> HD radios to consumers at this point is like selling a potion from
Brother Love's Traveling Salvation Show as a cure for disease.
>
> HD is a disease.
>
> At best, it's an engineering work around for analog radio.
>
> At
> worst, HD gives false hope that listeners will actually float radio
owners by buying the expensive equipment to receive a digital signal
with precious little content attached.
>
> This is nuts.
>
> Steve
> Jobs wouldn't expect his customers to buy an iPod without offering a
vast music library to make the device a worthy investment.
>
> By
> the way, a competitor of Apple, Spiral Frog, just launched its run at
iTunes that must be directly out of the pages of the HD playbook: Spiral
Frog's music is free, but you can't share it. You have to wait 90
seconds for the first download. Have to sign-up and re-sign up monthly.
It only works on Windows. Can't be heard on an iPod and, oh, did I
mention that only one of the big four labels is contributing music to
that pig -- I mean frog.
>
> Another pig you can't put lipstick on is consolidation, but I don't want to
> squeal too much about that here.
>
> HD on QVC.
>
> Can you imagine how pissed buyers are going to be.
>
> I'm going to turn QVC on and have a few laughs.  (If I'm a lawyer, I'm
recording it).
>
> But it's really not a laughing matter.
>
> It's
> painful to see a once proud industry acting like it's selling snake oil.
That's my opinion. Others have different points of view.
>
> If
> I'm running a terrestrial radio company right now, I'm hiring the best
and brightest programmers (even if I have to get them out of retirement
or steal them from unappreciative consolidators) and I'm telling them
they have carte blanche to program to the available Gen X and baby
boomer audience. Not Gen Y!
>
> I'm then investing heavily in
> Internet streaming and technologies and hiring the youngest, smartest
and most skateboard proficient young people to help me build
> programming for where the next generation lives.
>
> Wait.
>
> I've just described CBS.
>
> I
> don't know where CBS Radio President Dan Mason stands on HD today -- he
was a big booster before he took his present job. May still be. But he's
sure performing like a Renaissance man now and HD has nothing to do with
the current CBS turnaround.
>
> This is my way of saying to my radio brethren -- it's time to move on --
beyond HD radio.
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________ Gear
up for Halo® 3 with free downloads and an exclusive offer. It?s our way
> of saying thanks for using Windows Live?.
> http://gethalo3gear.com?ocid=SeptemberWLHalo3_WLHMTxt_2
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.30/1025 - Release Date: 9/23/2007
> 1:53 PM
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>




_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx