Re: [IRCA] QSLing
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] QSLing




--- Martin and Wendy Foltz <martinfoltz@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> The question would be, how do they
> check it against the station log? I ask, how many really do check it?

*** THere are other ways to confirm what was heard than comparing it to
the log. I would seriously doubt that many stations that do QSl today
check the log, especially with today's reduced logging requirements.


> I know
> some do as I have received copies of the log with my QSLs. Another
> question
> is fakes. If a station had a card and other DXers have them, it's
> harder to
> make a fake. It was also harder to fake their stationary. Emails can
> be
> faked and email cards can be "acquired" without reports. 

*** Emails carry time and origin documentation in the headers, but of
course if someone wants to fake, they'll conveniently omit those. But
let's be real here, too -- most of us who've been at this any length of
time have a pretty good idea about possible fakes anyway, so those
people are only folling themselves.





Russ Edmunds
Blue Bell, PA  ( 360' ASL )
[15 mi NNW of Philadelphia]
40:08:45N; 75:16:04W, Grid FN20ID
<wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
FM: Yamaha T-80 & Onkyo T-450RDS w/ APS9B @15'
AM: Hammarlund HQ-150 & 4' FET air core loop

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx