Re: [IRCA] TP DX 10/9/06
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] TP DX 10/9/06



Not as good as yesterday but not bad with audio on 558, 594, 603, 648, 657, 
693, 747, 774 and 1566 heard from 1310 to 1340 UT.

Bill Block
Prescott Valley, AZ
R-390A
EWE (20x50x20)









>From: mwdxer@xxxxxxxxx (Patrick Martin)
>Reply-To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of 
>America<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, am@xxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [IRCA] TP DX 10/9/06
>Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 08:05:30 -0700
>
>Greetings,
>
>Levels were down a bit on many channels this morning and there were more
>DUs, per the higher solar numbers. I caught ABC on 531 & 558. I presume
>Western Australia and they were //. Filipino on 612, I presume DYHP
>again and also on 1062 (DZEC). CC on 936 & 945 were not as strong but
>still there. No CC/RR under KGO, just KGO and KTBI.   I sat on 1170 for
>a time around 1430 and Korea was there, but also Cantonese under it. I
>would guess VOA, as they are listed as Cantonese between 1300-1500. This
>needs closer watching. I would like to get an ID out of that. As it was
>I did get some Cantonese talk on tape, but not at ID time. Maybe I can
>pull out an ID on that one. CC u/o JOHK on 1287 this morning. So over
>all not a bad morning.
>
>73,
>
>Patrick
>
>Patrick Martin
>KAVT Reception Manager
>
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
>original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
>IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx