I once thought about building an alarm system to let me know if one of
my locals went off the air. This was back before personal computers,
so my idea involved a box full of transistor radios, each hooked to a
detector that would let me know when there wasn't any audio present. I
never got around building it, but it would have been an interesting
project. Nowadays, we have PC controlled radios, which wouldn't be hard to set up for this purpose. Have it scan through each local or semi-local pest and compare the signal level to a predetermined threshold. If the signal level is too low after a couple of scans, have it sound the alarm. Bruce Bob Foxworth wrote: I am forwarding this from the broadcast list. The part about the remote monitoring stations is quite interesting. I wonder if this is something that is cost-effective for a DX listener to try and duplicate, assuming he has access to a site with a connection, though of course it may not be adequate as a true DX receiver. It's probably simpler to just use dx-tuners service. But a remote receiver just a few km away could make a nice space-diversity system along with your home rx. - Bob sent at 1718 estDate: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 22:36:56 -0500 From: Mark Humphrey <mark3xy@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: [BC] FCC Enforcement Priorities To: broadcast@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Our guest speaker at the Philadelphia SBE meeting this evening wasJohnRahtes, head of the local FCC Enforcement Bureau office. Here's abriefsummary of his presentation. When his staff make random inspections of broadcast stations, theyfocus onthree things: 1) Public File 2) Tower 3) EAS The public file should include ALL required sections -- they now pay _particular_ attention to the issues-program lists. The tower(s) must be registered and have proper ID numbers postedunlessexempted by the rules. Inspectors also want to see fencing, lockedgates,RF warning signs, and general compliance with RF safety procedures. For EAS, they will check to see that the equipment is operatingproperly andthat tests have been received, sent, and logged as required by therules.Here's something to keep in mind: Instead of camping out in theirtrucks,the agents now set up remote monitoring stations, accessible on demandviathe Internet, to check for EAS compliance, station IDs, proper sign-on/sign-off of daytimers, pattern changes, etc. These remoteboxes aretemporarily installed in US Post Offices, local police stations, orothergovernment buildings near the transmitter of interest. If a licenseeisfound to be in violation of a rule, the bureau will usually monitoritsactivity for a while to verify that corrective measures have actuallybeentaken. John also mentioned that his budget has never been higher than it isunderthis Administration -- he has more vehicles, staff and equipment thaneverbefore. Be careful, Mark ------------------------------_______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
_______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx