[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Swprograms] Sirius' Elvis Channel is on 87.9 in Brooklyn, New York
- Subject: [Swprograms] Sirius' Elvis Channel is on 87.9 in Brooklyn, New York
- From: David Goren <dbgoren@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 10:17:30 -0500
Not sure where to post this curiosity...but someone is relaying Sirius'
Elvis Channel in New York City. I am receiving it in scenic Flatbush,
New York. 87.9 is a frequency that's popular among the many FM pirates
that we have here, so I'm presuming it's one of them.
On Nov 1, 2005, at 11:04 PM, John Figliozzi wrote:
> But isn't that really only cosmetic? Had management made a decision
> that was not ultimately in keeping with the wishes of the FCO, would
> it have been allowed to stand?
>
> Of course, FCO's "right" to determine languages is a political
> decision. But it is possible for a political decision to be made and
> a political agenda to be formed "on the merits". With respect to
> language decisions over the years, it at least appears to be the case
> that in every circumstance there were good and valid reasons to add
> or drop a language. One can even make a case on the merits for
> Tusa's self-described "worse nightmare"--a WS with English and a
> handful of other "major" languages.
>
> To me, "freedom and independence within the context of an individual
> language service" is more than enough to fit the bill.
>
> John Figliozzi
>
>
> On Nov 1, 2005, at 6:18 PM, Richard Cuff wrote:
>
>> I had a different problem with Tusa's argument.
>>
>> By definition, having to make a language decision means there is a
>> political agenda. There always has been.
>>
>> So -- up until now -- the BBCWS could only be "Free and Independent"
>> within the context of an individual language service.
>>
>> It could be argued that the BBCWS is now *more* free & independent
>> because, having to play a zero-sum game financially, it made its own
>> language decisions without FCO meddling.
>>
>> Richard Cuff / Allentown, PA
>>
>> On 11/1/05, Mike Barraclough <softbulletin1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Tusa's argument is fundamentally flawed. His first two
>>> paragraphs are emotive bluster using phrases such as
>>> cull and unequal sacrifice and making a contrast
>>> between ten radio services and 'a single Arabic
>>> television service' hoping the reader will not realise
>>> that in fact this single Arabic television service
>>> will cover a huge amount of territory.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Swprograms mailing list
>> Swprograms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/swprograms
>>
>> To unsubscribe: Send an E-mail to swprograms-request@hard-core-
>> dx.com?subject=unsubscribe, or visit the URL shown above.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Swprograms mailing list
> Swprograms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/swprograms
>
> To unsubscribe: Send an E-mail to
> swprograms-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe, or visit the
> URL shown above.
>
_______________________________________________
Swprograms mailing list
Swprograms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/swprograms
To unsubscribe: Send an E-mail to swprograms-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe, or visit the URL shown above.