[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Swprograms] Trojan horses (link corrected)
- Subject: Re: [Swprograms] Trojan horses (link corrected)
- From: Richard Cuff <rdcuff@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 10:48:40 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=q0Efiy2ijfgzT9Ll8M+Pn11XoNO0cdeiJNImTkpN5ZQ2YkgyzH6yRFy6PpL/imVLDe/u6gGNd8QV0BpfymX0+HPr2T3BzjnmDUQp0XNoPSA7VtX+TwURrarTJm21ww/VKg2EYbqUpq9vDlkQRxHWTIww5nTpg+OzZ126HbLMT3o=
Consumers rarely distinguish who they listen to by public vs. private
sector. You have a given number of hours per day to fill the space
between your ears. That space can be filled with MP3s, CDs, DVDs,
Yahoo! Launchcast, Howard Stern, the BBC, NPR, CBC, Classic FM, DW,
Radio Australia, Rush Limbaugh, CNN, BSkyB, whatever. All of these
are, legitimately, BBC competitors.
The only way people know NPR is on public radio is by the begging.
When asked why they listen to NPR, I assert their answer would be
"because it's good radio", not "because it's public radio."
Rich Cuff
On 5/27/05, Mike Barraclough <softbulletin1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> I do not agree with your seeming assertion that people
> with a commercial background should not hold BBC
> management positions. It is a generalisation. If BBC
> management personnel have been in the commercial
> sector it could be argued they see better the
> different approaches and can use the commercial
> sectors marketing skills they have seen to raise
> revenue for a public sector broadcaster without
> compromising the programming.
_______________________________________________
Swprograms mailing list
Swprograms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://dallas.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/swprograms
To unsubscribe: Send an E-mail to swprograms-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe, or visit the URL shown above.