[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Swprograms] Consultants view of BBC's public service role
- Subject: Re: [Swprograms] Consultants view of BBC's public service role
- From: Richard Cuff <rdcuff@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 16:26:56 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=nL6Ip1Kv1eR4ifg2a8rP+sWg7HbhVsbEbbCE9jeJSd9OSVjwSv3wXKXHLZMlZ4IYxKUCL9nWhylB31Ma00KnDKHuIJtG6LZGYGB49QYVpKys6g/2bq5Vce6bPctCBMBZWPJ9FYgQh6XAhXPGQ4DGzPCH3DDY53uVL2sYW4jj8uM=
Heh... perhaps you can see why I am so interested in analyzing trends
and strategy changes in broadcasting.
But seriously, the rate at which new media habits are being developed
is dizzying.
The term "podcasting" didn't exist a year ago.
TiVo has not been around much either.
It was interesting to see that Gyr works with many different types of
"enterprises". That word choice is important -- it includes
businesses, governments, and nonprofits.
Richard Cuff / Allentown, PA USA
On 4/13/05, Scott Royall <royall@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Now we know you're a "plant." :)
>
> Seriously, I sure endured a lot of those presentations before Shell let me
> go.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: swprograms-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:swprograms-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Richard Cuff
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 2:52 PM
> To: Shortwave programming discussion
> Subject: Re: [Swprograms] Consultants view of BBC's public service role
>
> Seems that a common thread to all this is the notion of significant
> change that's taking place in "radio listening". I don't know what it
> should be called...content distribution sounds wrong. Frankly,
> content *aggregation* is probably not too far off a description.
>
> In the USA much public programming -- even that distributed by NPR --
> comes from independent producers.
>
> One of the things Mr. Gyr is doing is emphasizing the importance of
> the BBC "brand". Whether a program is produced internally or
> externally doesn't matter -- it must nonetheless be compatible with
> the image, reputation, and credibility the BBC has as a broadcaster.
>
> One of his titles looks interesting: "The Dynamic Enterprise: Tools
> for Turning Chaos into Strategy and Strategy into Action".
>
> Instead of "Anna Analogue" and "Digital Joe", a more apropos moniker
> might be "Curious George", from a series of children's books.
>
> FWIW, part of what I do is in a similar space -- helping companies
> understand and respond to the actions of their competitors in an
> environment when user needs are changing.
>
> I can't draw either.
>
> 8-)
>
> Richard Cuff / Allentown, PA USA
>
> On 4/13/05, Mike Barraclough <mikewb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Senior programme editors across the BBC are being shown a badly edited
> video
> > of a "presentation" designed to explain "the new myth" of the BBC and to
> > clear up any confusion over why 20 per cent of its programme makers must
> now
> > be made redundant.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Swprograms mailing list
> Swprograms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dallas.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/swprograms
>
> To unsubscribe: Send an E-mail to
> swprograms-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe, or visit the URL
> shown above.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Swprograms mailing list
Swprograms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://dallas.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/swprograms
To unsubscribe: Send an E-mail to swprograms-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe, or visit the URL shown above.