[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Swprograms] Speaking of WETA : ...Radio Romania and NPR: Some Surprising Similarities]
- Subject: [Swprograms] Speaking of WETA : ...Radio Romania and NPR: Some Surprising Similarities]
- From: Daniel Say <say@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:03:00 -0800
----- Forwarded message from say@xxxxxx -----
Subject: NPR : Radio Romania and NPR: Some Surprising Similarities
X-URL: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4518245
Column by Jeffrey A. Dvorkin
NPR Ombudsman
By [13]Jeffrey A. Dvorkin
Radio Romania and NPR: Some Surprising Similarities
[14]NPR.org, March 1, 2005 ? Sometimes, the best perspectives about
home are found away.
I spent the last week in Bucharest, on the invitation of the
journalists and managers at Radio Romania. They asked me to speak
about the role of an ombudsman in an independent public radio system.
The visit was certainly enlightening for me, and it got me thinking
about some aspects of public radio in America that we sometimes take
for granted.
Some Differences
There are many significant differences between NPR and Radio Romania:
the most important being Radio Romania's relationship with the
Romanian Parliament.
Funding for Radio Romania comes from a compulsory license fee paid by
everyone who owns a radio or television. But the authorization for
broadcasting comes directly from parliament.
NPR, on the other hand is a private, not-for-profit corporation. It
receives some money indirectly, from the U.S. Congress through
federally funded agencies such as the Corporation for Public
Broadcasting. In total, that amounts to about 1 percent of its annual
budget.
Some Tough Choices
In Romania, some parliamentarians are often deeply involved with daily
programming, giving their opinions on who should be interviewed and
for how long. While some politicians told me they are committed to the
principles of an "arm's-length" relationship with public radio, others
seem less sure and believe that Radio Romania must act as a
counterbalance to a lively but often scandal-obsessed private media.
A few politicians would prefer Radio Romania to be an "official" voice
of government, with perhaps a bit of folk music thrown in, most people
inside Radio Romania want a more western model -- an independent and
skeptical radio service.
The question is how to balance those competing and conflicting
interests and values.
Management on a Tightrope
News management everywhere is a balancing act.
But in Bucharest, management has to walk a very narrow line between
the heavy presence of the politicians and the prickly instincts of the
journalists, who are quick to bristle with accusations of censorship
at the least sign of pressure -- either internal or external.
Sometimes, the journalists may sense that any attempt at management is
a harbinger of censorship.
The Communist Legacy
The 800-pound gorilla in every meeting I attended was, of course, the
late and entirely unlamented communist leader, Nicolae Ceaucescu.
Ceaucescu ran a uniquely brutal regime even by the appalling standards
of 20th century European communism. It ended on Christmas Day, 1989,
when he and his wife Elena were executed and a democratic government
took over. But Ceaucescu's ghost haunts Romania still.
Romanians constantly ask themselves how they can create long-lasting
democratic institutions including a free press. This issue is key for
Radio Romania.
An Ombudsman for Radio Romania?
So under these complicated conditions, would an ombudsman at Radio
Romania make a difference?
That was the question I was repeatedly asked -- but found extremely
difficult to answer. I believe an ombudsman could be a force for an
open and accountable media, but years of repression have left behind a
legacy of suspicion, defensiveness and distrust that will take some
time to overcome.
I do, however, hope that Radio Romania appoints an ombudsman. He or
she will have to have nerves of steel and come prepared for some
difficult issues and some very tough political interests, since
journalism tends to take its cues from the political environment. In
Romania, journalism, like politics, is not a spectator sport.
Different Radios -- Same Questions
Public Radio journalists in Romania and the United States do face
similar issues:
? How are media truly accountable to the public they purport to serve?
? How can a public broadcaster remain independent of the special
political and financial interests?
? How can management embolden its journalists to commit fearless and
responsible journalism without unleashing a backlash from its
political masters?
? What are the confidence-building measures that all sides need to
create a radio service that is journalistically reliable and credible
in the eyes (and ears) of the listeners?
I came away deeply impressed with the passion of the Radio Romania
staff, which is committed to creating a truly public service radio.
We should wish them well, because their success or failure will have
its impact on all of us.
_______________________________________________
Swprograms mailing list
Swprograms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://dallas.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/swprograms
To unsubscribe: Send an E-mail to swprograms-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe, or visit the URL shown above.