[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] Expanded-Band Owner Objects to AM Surrender Plan
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] Expanded-Band Owner Objects to AM Surrender Plan
- From: "Paul B. Walker, Jr." <walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 14:29:30 -0900
- Delivered-to: archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=iVXaDdlRfDuvf2G3lClXri83hPCSnYWRG58BT3WN58I=; b=0EcEoM6nC0xi5DqgEhgYGJaAoGT2REqY8erEnxLmEVkxmVo9I1kaOVf2M3IsaMI6e+ txKYzuyg9U+gKhX5kCs2EKZpsRRFTX9H7SJu7nlchysfena2qV4FpR4xmW9mPn1F0dHc JQUeZRi3qXERblBUpRhztKcv7/BVe0Z6ccIgpNjIRjaTFt8w67CPMrLwwWQ8kBjGQeoR IVjNMgHoYERTF3+OgZBgsyr3HEf+Wfs3B+Aal/apoRoreHndp85Jso20Q/XhU3aC/aFB HVh+kwg3+En2heWk6NTNNqfXYI/UnQUi5qcJvL6q5yHTg6MB4SnQQvYWgecdOLUoYSwP viuw==
Yes Redding CA shut off the original AM, KNRO 1670 is left after what I
think was 600 went dark.
WVMI 570 went dark and is now WTNI 1640, in Biloxi Mississippi
Paul
On Wednesday, February 24, 2016, John Sampson <jnsampson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> I think it was five years. As I remember, after the five year period, the
> station either had to revert to its original allocation or move to the
> X-band and take the original station off the air. Also, I think that the
> original purpose of the X-band was to mitigate interference on the regular
> band and give some stations an opportunity to get rid of expensive
> directional arrays as well as boosting their coverage. I believe that
> several of the X-band stations (Redding, California, and Brigham City,
> Utah, come to mind) actually followed the original guidelines. Omaha took
> the 1180 station off the air for a couple of years but then somehow
> reactivated the 1180 frequency, obviously with the FCC's approval. I agree
> with Russ, it's another case where the FCC didn't follow its original
> guidelines (but what else is new!).
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 24, 2016, at 3:57 PM, Russ Edmunds wrote:
>
> > Trying to change the rules you knew were part of the deal at the time.
> >
> > The real problem here is that the FCC - typically - ignored that part of
> > the deal - the surrenders were supposed to take place
> > on a much shorter time limit, although I don't recall exactly what it
> was.
> >
> > Russ Edmunds
> > 15 mi NW Phila
> > Grid FN20id
> > <wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>>
> >
> > AM: Modified Sony ICF2010's (2) barefoot w/whip
> > FM: Yamaha T-80 & T-85, each w/ Conrad RDS Decoder;
> > Onkyo T-450RDS; Tecsun PL-310 ( 2);
> > modified Sony ICF2010 w/APS9B @ 15';
> > Grundig G8 w/whip; modified Sony ICF2010 w/whip
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Dennis Gibson <wb6tnb@xxxxxxxxx
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> http://www.radioworld.com/article/expanded-band-owner-objects-to-am-surrender-plan/278222
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPad
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> IRCA mailing list
> >> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
> >> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >>
> >> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> >> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> >> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >>
> >> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >>
> >> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <javascript:;>
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx