[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] KQQZ
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] KQQZ
- From: Dennis Gibson <wb6tnb@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 19:42:03 -0700
- Delivered-to: archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:references:from:content-type:in-reply-to:message-id:date:to :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=B6i9iDGFQtBzHWvoHrQNbt0Upl+TkOCiJiMr7gK1ssM=; b=IW74LWmwa5Q5g1lGXShcx3vSDbbY4WBk3N68SR2RTL55PzIKJ84L2ZAPdJFHCenKtw TnDyLnrJAnyyIfRmniB7/u5xOfdAycvI/uMH0VmyaFTO0VLk/xVhD2PoiyOGbJDeh6+B Fd2E+bduNYbiIyoetHM1iJdksadV73vQTXXHRKYVTpBvJLQhHAnIbnnLEoHjnZdE9g4/ xCx0bi1bSqh0HRMFNFo/m2VvUYXTY9dZDcBrcZpKpnGo1x/sEEHt/K4B4Ej56IP37JB7 zVc1clzAywx1F3qkUjOVeqttWn6QuYQhThIAyRgF3ncbaG+dxer+IQuAJ7gMonOUdLsf 1t3A==
Radio-locator uses the word pattern but their maps are predicted coverage areas, which aren't the same thing. The patterns in the FCC database and FCCInfo.com are what are licensed or granted in a construction permit.
http://fccinfo.com/CMDProFacLookup.php?sCurrentService=AM&sFacilityID=5281&tabSearchType=Faci
The construction permit isn't on radio-locator. That doesn't mean anything.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 10, 2015, at 7:07 PM, Forrest Skaine <todftscytj7707@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Radio locator at one the me showed their CP facilities that showed their
> pattern to go due north at night. It was under that assumption that I'd
> thought they were on their new facilities. Then if what others are saying
> no, then their current pattern favors the SW greatly. So vased on the
> signal strength that I hear them I would gather they are running 10kw ND at
> nights or "new" night power? Regardless they are dominate all the time at
> night.
>
> Todd Skaine
> Woodbury, MN
> Sony ICF 2010
> Toyota car radio
>> On Apr 10, 2015 8:59 PM, "Rick Dau" <drummer1965us@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> I'm with Steve on this one, Nigel. The FCC database shows KQQZ as still
>> licensed to DeSoto, MO, so that's what I'd go with. And yes, they sure
>> sound like they're on 10 KW non-stop. I have a local on 1180 and if I null
>> them out, then tune up to 1190 and hit the USB button on the ol' Kenwood
>> R-5000, I get KQQZ pretty strong. I'm thinking that during the station
>> tour of WOWO in July -- and I assume there WILL be one forthcoming! -- this
>> ought to be mentioned to their engineer(s), who, in turn, might contact the
>> FCC to have some action taken. 73,Rick DauSouth Omaha, Nebraska EN21af
>>
>> To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> From: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> CC: amdxmail@xxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [IRCA] KQQZ
>> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 23:49:34 +0000
>>
>>
>> --Forwarded Message Attachment--
>> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 19:49:31 -0400
>> From: amdxmail@xxxxxxx
>> To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [IRCA] KQQZ
>>
>> The CP for 650 watts nights and Fairview Heights, Illinois has been around
>> since the fall of 2010. Far as I know, it's not on yet. Don't they spend
>> most of their time on 10,000 watts anyway?
>>
>> Steve Francis
>> Alcoa, Tennessee
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Nigel Pimblett <nige2730@xxxxxxxxx>
>> To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America <
>> irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Fri, Apr 10, 2015 7:27 pm
>> Subject: [IRCA] KQQZ
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>> I heard KQQZ for the first time last night at 0600 UTC (1:00 am
>>
>> their time). I'm strongly suspecting they were on day power (to get
>>
>> through CFSL is an accomplishment), but I see they do have a CP for
>>
>> somewhat more power at night (and a move to an IL Community of License).
>>
>> Does anyone know if that has happened yet, so I know whether to count
>> it as MO
>> or IL?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Nigel Pimblett
>> Dunmore,
>> AB
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> IRCA mailing list
>> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>>
>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>>
>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>>
>> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx