Re: [IRCA] 1279 off-frequency mystery

[neilkaz <neilkaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

No trace of anything on 1279 has ever been noted on any antenna or any Perseus recording. 73 KAZ 35 miles NW of Chicago


-----Original Message-----
>From: Tim Tromp <kilokat7@xxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Sep 22, 2012 5:01 AM
>To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [IRCA] 1279 off-frequency mystery
>
>Scanning my Perseus SSS recording from UTC Sep.21st,2012 @ 0200 UTC, I
>see no 1 KHz offset carrier on 1280.  WNAM is spot-on.
>
>Tim Tromp
>West Michigan
>
>On Fri, 2012-09-21 at 10:40 -0700, Glenn Hauser wrote:
>> UNIDENTIFIED. 1279, Sept 21 at 0537 UT, once again for third time a weak off-frequency carrier making a 1-kHz het with 1280 stations. Loops NE/SW. I`ve yet to see any other reports of this. Based solely on approx. direxion, proximity, some possibilities:
>> 
>> WBIG Aurora IL
>> WGBF Evansville IN
>> KCOB Newton IA
>> WFYC Alma MI
>> WWTC Minneapolis MN
>> KDKD Clinton MO
>> KYRO Troy MO
>> WONW Defiance OH
>> KSLI Abilene TX
>> KMFR Pearsall TX
>> WGLR Lancaster WI
>> WNAM Neenah-Menasha WI
>> CFMB Montreal QC [far, but 50 kW]
>> XEBQ Chihuahua Chih
>> 
>> If not at night when I hear this, people within daytime range could check these out. Of course it could also be one of those top-secret US government tests. It`s not my semi-local KSOK Ark City KS, confirmed at 1525 UT Sept 21 as on-frequency (Glenn Hauser, Enid OK, DX LISTENING DIGEST) 
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx