[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] Michigan DUs Thu. morning 9/13/2012
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] Michigan DUs Thu. morning 9/13/2012
- From: neilkaz <neilkaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 13:52:28 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
To me, it sounds like you had 4QS. I had a decent carrier there, but unfortunately it was a couple dB too weak for audio and local WNDZ had their pre-s/on OC on earlier than normal to hurt it from 750. 73 KAZ
-----Original Message-----
>From: Tim Tromp <kilokat7@xxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Sep 13, 2012 8:45 PM
>To: "irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Cc: ABDX <ABDX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: [IRCA] Michigan DUs Thu. morning 9/13/2012
>
>From West Michigan, listening from 1100-1125 UTC this morning (1123
>local sunrise):
>
>657: Around 1110 UTC I noticed a fairly decent carrier on the waterfall
>producing 5 second long "dashes" where the signal would peak for five
>second durations, then dip and almost dropout completely for one second
>and return again. This pattern repeated for about 5 minutes until it
>gradually faded. No audio noted on the peaks.
>
>702: Finally peaked strong enough at 1118 UTC to retain the AM sync lock
>on the Perseus. Hints of audio through WLW's slop.
>
>738: Peaked about 1117 UTC with SAH noted and faint audio at times, but
>could not determine language.
>
>747: New! Carrier peaking to weak audio at 1116 UTC, talk between man
>and woman that sounded like an interview, possibly Aussie accented
>English but difficult for me to tell for certain. I've seen weak
>carriers here before but nothing close to audio until this morning.
>I've posted a clip to Youtube - warning though - the audio is weak on
>this one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yi4AXz8FawM
>
>680 KNBR also noted strong at 1100, but no sign of KFI during the same
>time. No other interesting domestics heard this morning.
>
>73,
>Tim Tromp
>West Michigan
>Perseus SDR + phased BOGs
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx