[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[IRCA] New Tecsun PL-310 ULR-- Awesome Performance on Three Bands
Hello All,
For those of you waiting on a detailed report before considering a purchase
of the latest DSP wonder from the Chinese domestic market, the four-band
investigation of the new Tecsun PL-310 LW-AM-FM-SW DSP-enhanced pocket radio
has been concluded here, and the results are very impressive.
The Longwave performance has been significantly improved from the PL-300WT
(a.k.a. G8) predecessor, so that competitive beacon reception is possible
using only the stock loopstick. Last night at 0800UTC I was able to log the
following beacons on these approximate frequencies: NY-351, ZP-369,
MOG-405, and also QQ-398. Of these four beacons, the PL-300WT (G8) had only a
trace of NY-351, and none of the other three.
On AM, I ran a detailed shootout between the new PL-310 and the Kchibo
D96L, the winner of the recent 2009 Ultralight Radio AM-DX Shootout (the
PL-300WT was thrown in also). The sensitivity of the PL-310 and D96L models is
very close overall, but the PL-310 has a decided edge in the mid-range
(700-1500 kHz) frequencies, while the D96L has a slight edge on the extreme
upper and lower band frequencies. Both the PL-310 and D96L walked all over the
PL-300WT (G8) in sensitivity, while in the selectivity tests, the PL-310 and
D96L had exactly equal performance [which was far superior to the PL-300WT
(G8)].
On FM, the performance of the new PL-310 matches the stellar PL-300WT (G8)
completely in both sensitivity and selectivity, so FM-DXing enthusiasts now
have another fantastic ULR to choose. Both of these models walked all over
the D96L in the FM performance tests, presumably because of the D96L's
shorter whip antenna.
On SW, the irritating AM spurs and mixing products of the PL-300WT have
been corrected in the PL-310, which provides sensitivity equal to that of the
PL-300WT without the side effects. The SW performance of the new PL-310 was
also quite impressive, but was a shade less than that of the E100 (PL-200)
models, making this the only band in which a competing ULR was able to
slightly exceed the PL-310 in performance.
The full details on the Tecsun PL-310's performance will be provided in a
mini-review on the new receiver, which should be wrapped up this evening.
In general, this new DSP model seems to be all we have hoped for (and maybe
even more!).
73, Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA)
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx