Re: [IRCA] Audio Phasing?

[Rob Moore <rmoore5@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Kevin,

Sorry for addressing you as Satya - Didn't realize that you had signed 
with a different name.

That's interest about the phasing results.  I've been looking for an 
excuse to buy an SRF-59, now I"ll have to buy two just to try this out!  
And I don't even do  much in the way of MW DX'ing, I'm just fascinated 
with receiving techniques to maximize clarity.

Thanks,
Rob

satya@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi Rob:
>
> Thanks for your note. You're right - it's the same principle as RF
> phasing, only at the AF stage.  I have a Quantum Phaser and numerous loops
> and wires, which often work in various combinations at the RF stage, but
> in many situations, especially with strong locals that are tough to phase,
> this works even better. Right now I am getting somewhat decent audio from
> a high school basketball game (probably Utah or Wyoming) underneath local
> 1210-KWMG, something I haven't been able to replicate with RF phasing.
>
> Tonight I've noticed that, once a null is established, one or both of the
> units can be rotated through pretty much 360 degrees to better locate the
> DX target station and/or get rid of the low hum that sometimes come with
> phasing of the pest, usually without having to tweak the volume controls.
>
> Kevin S
> Bainbridge Island, WA
>
>
>   
>> Satya,
>>
>> It sounds like what you are doing is the same thing as is done with the
>>     
> phasers available from Quantum, MFJ or other places, except that you
> require two radios to get the effect because you do it at the audio
> level,
>   
>> where the phasers out there generally do it at the antenna level and
>>     
> don't
>   
>> require two radios.  Admittedly, the radios are inexpensive but have you
>>     
> tried a phaser and is your effect any different or more pronounced?
>   
>> Rob
>>     
>
>
>
>
>   
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx