Re: [IRCA] TPs for 21 March

[nhp@xxxxxxxx]

Quoting Walter Salmaniw <salmaniw@xxxxxxx>:

>> >reasonable audios: 594, 747, 774, 828, 1566 of course....only 
> >oddballs were 639 (CC) and 1593 (JJ).
> >
> >not so reasonable audio: 558, 675, 738, 873, 1287,  1475, 1575
> >
> >probably a number of barely theres, but didn't take the time to dig.
>> 

> Not so fast, fellas.  I monitored between 13:39 and 14:30.  I agree that the
> bottom half was quite disappointing, but the upper half of the band was quite
> lively.  No, the signals were not earth shattering, but there was lots of
> audio up there that I don't often hear. 
> 
> 279 (8), 558 567 594 738 (all 6), 774 (7), 828 873 945 (all 6), 1134 (7),
> 1161 (? open carrier...strong), 1170 (I'm sure I heard KBS Liberty 2 under
> cochannel US station), 1242 1278 1296 1314 (all 6), 1323 (CRI a 7), 1377 1386
> (both 6), 1413 JOIF an 8 at 14:16, 1475 Malaysia an 8 at 14:20, 1494 1503
> (both 6), 1512 (7 at times, probable Filipino), 1557 (WYFR Taiwan a 7
> //7125), 1566 (8 HLAZ), 1575 and 1593 both 7s.  

This illustrates, I think, how variable things can be, Walt (as well as how 
spoiled I've been by a couple of better mornings).  Actually, when you leave 
out your "6's", which are the ones I didn't bother noting this morning 
(my "barely theres"), we heard about the same number of audios. 

But 1170 sounds like fun.  I've been checking 1440, but hadn't thought to try 
1170.

Nick




_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx