Re: [IRCA] How local IS WBZ?

["kevin - Gilbert, AZ" <amfmdx@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 5/17/06 10:24 AM, "CHARLES HUTTON" <charlesh3@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> (1) All digital IBOC (assuming the same power as currently used for analog)
> will cover way more area than analog. "How much more" is the question. Can
> you point me to any technical analysis that says all digital IBOC will have
> less coverage?

I also am of the belief for GW the coverage area will be a lot bigger but in
hybrid will be very small. In the case of DTV, signals provide a useable
signal far in excess of the analog signal and this with a smaller power.

However, don't look for anything via skywave if you DX digital if it's
anything like DTV. DTV rarely decodes more than a frame or two at best in an
Es session.

Kevin

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx