Re: [IRCA] IBOC/analog reception comparisons.

["Mary Anne" <masanford@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Have you discovered http://www.live365.com ? Run your own radio station for
a pitance. Be a DJ yourself.

-----Original Message-----
From: irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of The Kaskey Family
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 10:13 PM
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
Subject: Re: [IRCA] IBOC/analog reception comparisons.


I might add to Curt's observation.  My radio listening (non dx) is
strictly on the Internet.  I'm aware that I am in the vast minority of
radio listeners here but it has several positives I like...No
Commercials, formats I definitely appreciate & announcer-disc
jockey-whatever that add to the listening pleasure.  In the hay-days of
radio (1960s-70s) the disc jockey was extremely important.  Radio execs
have  run all but a few out of the business.  I find all this corporate
gobbledy-gook really distressing & tending to upset my innards...But,
don't take that personally-I find almost ALL corporations (these days)
to stir up my wrath.  More power to the "Z" man...........

don kaskey




"W. Curt Deegan" wrote:

> Sounds like nonsense to me.  Just like most poll results, it reflects
> the results wanted by those who pay for the poll.
>
> No ads, no fading from obstructions, play what you want when you
> want.  A play list is more than just content, it is the order and
> frequency played as well.  You collect all the songs you can, but you
> listen to what you like.
>
> Curt
>
> David Gleason wrote:
>
>> There is definitely an element of "it's my list" but the fact is,
>> extensive
>> research showed the average number of songs on an iPod is 300 and
>> they
>> closely mirror the playlist of the radio station the iPod user
>> listens to.
>>
>> The key issue is that carrying an iPod is cool, while a (analog)
>> radio is
>> not. iPod = cool. Digital = Cool. Make radio digital, it is cooler
>> than it
>> was and moves up in image among entertainment choices.
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [
>> mailto:irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> On Behalf Of W. Curt Deegan
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 5:47 PM
>> To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
>> Subject: Re: [IRCA] IBOC/analog reception comparisons.
>>
>> It doesn't have anything to do with digital, except as a means to
>> an
>> end.  It is their play list, not someone else's, that's why they
>> like it.
>>
>> W. Curt Deegan
>> Boca Raton, (Southeast) Florida
>>
>>
>>
>> David Gleason wrote:
>>
>>
>> > Put a frame around those comments! Very nicely stated, Russ.
>> >
>> > Perception is reality, or why would people prefer the ultra
>> > compressed
>> >
>> audio
>>
>> > on an iPod to CDs and FM?  It's because it's an iPod and it's
>> > digital!
>> >
>> >
>    ----------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx