Re: [IRCA] The ongoing IBOC discussion...
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] The ongoing IBOC discussion...



So lets say that in a few years everything is IBOC and we want to listen to 
digital DX but it is no where near S9+20 but we have amplifiers and digital 
signal processing and noise reduction. Will we be able to listen and when I 
can phase some back end superpest down to 5 to 10 dB below my target will my 
target be able to decode ?

73 KAZ
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lee Reynolds" <kd1sq@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2005 9:23 PM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] The ongoing IBOC discussion...


> ...I said it two or three years ago on the (iirc) NRC list, I'll say it 
> again -
>
> If one were suitably paranoid, one would think that IBOC is really about 
> getting
> rid of the less well-funded competition AND forcing much sharper market 
> area
> definition due to the fact you need (if my ongoing experiences with DRM is 
> any
> guide) an S9+20 signal for reliable audio stream decoding. This means you 
> *have
> to* listen to your relatively local stations because they're the only ones 
> you
> *can* listen to. (Or will be, once the analog cobroadcast goes away...)
>
> Gotta hand it to the marketing types - it's ingenious!
>
>       Lee
> 

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx