Re: [IRCA] AFN AM Frequencies

["Paul B. Walker, Jr." <walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx>]

On of the 1575s is Eagle.  The others are power talk or thunder I think


On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 6:04 PM Walter Salmaniw <canswl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Listen to the clip carefully.  There seems to me to be several AFN stations
>
> audible, all slightly out of sync.  PAL lists 3 in Korea.  My suspicion is
>
> that we're hearing all 3.  In Masset, I have very occasionally heard
>
> similar, slightly out of sync transmitters on 1575, when programming is in
>
> //.  Other times, they play different feeds.  I'll definitely spend more
>
> time on 1440 when I'm in Masset next time.  73,....Walt
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 10:32 PM, <d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Chris and All,
>
> >
>
> > 1440-AFN in Daegu apparently has enough strength to be easily heard in
> the
>
> > Tokyo area. Hiroyuki Okamura of Yokosuka, Japan received this signal (and
>
> > ID) on his modified Ultralight radio yesterday
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/
>
> > tupy1vuhvcck7ra/1440kHz%20AFN%202017-01-02%201700%20UTC.mp3?dl=0
>
> >
>
> > Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA)
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
>
> >
>
> > From: "Chris Kadlec" <beaglebass@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> > To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> > Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2016 7:15:45 AM
>
> > Subject: Re: [IRCA] AFN AM Frequencies
>
> >
>
> > Patrick,
>
> >
>
> > I think they're correct about Korea anyway. Japan could be another
> story. I
>
> > wholly believe that AFN on 1440 Daegu is running a full 5kw. They
> upgraded
>
> > their equipment back in May when they moved from the very-occupied 1080
>
> > frequency (Seoul was on there jamming as well as MBC Yeosu and 1500kw
> Haeju
>
> > just outside of metro Seoul and the list goes on) and when they came on
>
> > 1440, they had a very good signal, far, far better than the 10 and 20kw
>
> > stations half the distance from Seoul that are inaudible, many having
> gone
>
> > to much lower power due to lack of listeners, as is the Korean norm these
>
> > days for non-government (KBS) stations.
>
> >
>
> > 1575 is a regular in Seoul and comes in like a 1kw station once VOA turns
>
> > off. It wouldn't compare to the other Japanese 5kw stations that have
> clear
>
> > signals from down there. I've never heard 810 before because of locals
> and
>
> > Hangzhou is 150kw. 648 is certainly 10kw. I could hear that regularly in
>
> > Seoul from nearly 800 miles out.
>
> >
>
> > And the document mentions authorized power of course, not actual. 3kw on
>
> > the
>
> > USAG Humphreys' FM signal ain't happening. I lived 7 miles from that
> tower
>
> > which bleeds like mad into the adjacent 88.5 Osan 8 miles from the
>
> > Humphreys' tower on 88.3. 88.3 isn't running 3kw but the standard 50w or
>
> > so,
>
> > and they both get out a good 40 miles at that. But you take the info you
>
> > can
>
> > get!!
>
> >
>
> > -Chris Kadlec
>
> > Seoul AM Radio Listening Guide
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > > Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 06:15:37 +0000
>
> > > From: Patrick Martin <mwdxer@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> > > Subject: Re: [IRCA] AFN AM Frequencies
>
> > >
>
> > > DX friends in Korea tell me that none of the Korean AFN stations are
>
> > > running a full 5 KW, (As some are listed),as they just do not have that
>
> > > good a signal. The towers are short and they just do not have much
>
> > > coverage. I tried for years to nab one, but no luck here as yet. One
> Dxer
>
> > > said some years back, that he never heard any when he was in Japan.
> Their
>
> > > ground system probably leaves a lot to be desired. I have heard
> AFN-810,
>
> > > 648, and 1575 (Japan), as well as AFTRS 1550 (Now 810) and several
> AFRTS
>
> > > outlets from Taiwan in the 60s (1560-1570).
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > Patrick
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > Patrick Martin Seaside OR KGED QSL Manager
>
> >
>
> > _______________________________________________
>
> > IRCA mailing list
>
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> >
>
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>
> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>
> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> >
>
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> >
>
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > _______________________________________________
>
> > IRCA mailing list
>
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> >
>
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>
> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>
> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> >
>
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> >
>
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> >
>
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> IRCA mailing list
>
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx