Re: [IRCA] If Skywave Protection for Class A's was Ended, Would That be Good for DX'ers or Bad?

["Paul B. Walker, Jr." <walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx>]

And DX'ers being able to hear stations at great distances doesnt matter a
hill -o beans in this proposal.. DX'ers add nothing to a stations bottom
line

On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Richard Allen <richarda@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> I agree with Russ.  It would create a log jam worse than we already have.
> Iâm of the opinion the Govât needs to eliminate some of these useless noise
> makers.  Iâm a DX-er who want to hear stations at great distance, not count.
>
> Richard.
>
> > On Nov 21, 2016, at 16:02, Russ Edmunds <wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Anything that potentially adds more stations or activates more stations
> at
> > night is only going to make interference worse. An individual DX'er may
> log
> > a few, and probably will lose more.
> >
> > I'd probably suggest 500 as opposed to 350 or 700 miles because for some
> of
> > the 1A's there is an audience that matters out of the local area. How far
> > out they are and how this would impact them is probably unknowable.
> >
> > But adding more watts and/or more stations isn't solving the problem of
> > having granted too many small stations to begin with.
> >
> > Russ Edmunds
> > 15 mi NW Phila
> > Grid FN20id
> > <wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > AM: Modified Sony ICF2010's (4) barefoot w/whip
> > FM: Yamaha T-80 & T-85, each w/ Conrad RDS Decoder;
> > Onkyo T-450RDS; Tecsun PL-310 ( 4);
> > modified Sony ICF2010's (3) w/APS9B @ 15';
> > modified Sony ICF2010 w/whip
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Les Rayburn <les@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Dennis referenced this article earlier today:
> >> http://www.radioworld.com/article/kill-the-class-a-
> >> skywave-protections-now-nabob-urges/280058
> >>
> >> Forgetting the impact to the industry or individual radio stations,
> would
> >> this be positive or negative for DXâers? Why do you think so?
> >>
> >> Personally as someone who has logged less than 700 stations so far with
> my
> >> meager efforts, I have mixed emotions. Ending Class A protection might
> give
> >> me a better chance to log additional stations on the Clear Channel
> >> frequencies. For example, Iâve never logged anything on 650 KHz where
> WSM
> >> dominates. Likewise WSB, and a couple of others.
> >>
> >> But it would also virtually eliminate any chance of my logging some
> other
> >> stations that have eluded me so far.
> >>
> >> How do others feel?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 73,
> >>
> >> Les Rayburn, N1LF
> >> 121 Mayfair Park
> >> Maylene, AL
> >> EM63nf
> >>
> >> Member WTFDA, IRCA, NRC. Former CPC Chairman for NRC & IRCA.
> >>
> >> Elad FDM-S2 SDR, AirSpy SDR, Quantum Phaser, Wellbrook ALA1530 Loop,
> >> Wellbrook Flag, Clifton Labs Active Whip.
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> IRCA mailing list
> >> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >>
> >> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> >> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> >> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >>
> >> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >>
> >> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx