Thanks Nick. After freshly calibrating this morning, I noted three
standouts here: 737.998, 738.001 & 737.002 and I suspected the last two
(also the strongest) were 2NR & Tahiti. Both were producing a bit of audio
again here this morning. The .998 is the one that got my attention and it
wasn't far behind Tahiti in carrier strength.
73,
-Tim
On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Putting me on the spot, Tim. I've got to get serious about this again.
> I can give you the relative settings for now from this morning's files:
> 2NR was highest, with Tahiti 1.1Hz lower and a suspected NZ (it was noted
> at 0800 with no sign yet of 2NR) 3Hz lower than Tahiti.
> IF we assume that KSL-1160 was spot on (it has been for quite awhile, but
> I haven't checked recently), then 2NR was 738.0029 (can't swear on the
> last digit, say +/-0.2Hz), Tahiti 738.0018, possible NZ 737.9988, but
> that's a big assumption to start with. See if I can do better tomorrow.
> The MWoffset listings are 5 years old, so things could have changed. A
> remote Perseus could at least verify that I've got the relative offsets.
> Mauno Ritola might have something to say about the issue. I believe he
> checks the remote Perseus servers and might be able to tell you which are
> accurate.
> best wishes,
> Nick
> At 10:48 01-10-16, you wrote:
> Excerpt from mwoffsets:
>>
>> 737.9993 AUS 2NR ABC North Coast NSW
>> 738.0012 OCE Polynesie 1�¨re (Mahina/Pointe de Venus)
>> 738.003 NZL Radio Live (Christchurch/Marshland)
>>
>> Can someone from the west coast confirm these offsets?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Tim