Re: [IRCA] Cheater term and the FCC
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] Cheater term and the FCC



--- Patrick Martin <mwdxer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>    The general thought still seems to be that FM
> IBOC has a chance, but
> AM IBOC will not be around long. I hope they are
> right too.
>    I don't know how many engineers see our postings
> on other lists, but
> I know of several who has forwarded me postings from
> both lists. So I
> guess they care what we think.


But, Patrick, the main problem is that the FCC made it
where you HAVE to have it on MW and FM.  DRM itself
has the same frailties that HD has. It only works on
VERY strong interference free signals. 


Powell

NNNN  
POP email is powell at backroads  DOT     net
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx