Re: [IRCA] SP 600 /R390
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] SP 600 /R390



At 10:02 AM 5/6/2007 -0700, you wrote:
>Bob,
>
>I never knew that. Then the R-390 does have an honest Noise Blanker and
>not a Noise Limiter as the SP 600 had. Now that is interesting. I wonder
>what kind of circuit the R 390 uses? Anyone know? That diode set up in
>the SP-600 never did anything much except distort the audio as you
>mentioned. That was the only reason I sold the SP 600. It was one great
>receiver and netted me a lot of great DX through the years. One thing I
>really miss is the crystal phasing. I wish the crystal filters in the
>SPR4 had phasing.
>73,
>Patrick
>Patrick Martin

Patrick,

AFAIK, the R-390's NOISE LIMITER is essentially the same as the R-390A's
NOISE LIMITER. Neither are noise blankers in the proper sense of the
term. All they do is chop off the audio at a predetermined level as set
by the operator by adjusting the LIMITER pot. Like the SP-600, they tend
to distort the audio.

The R-390A is the result of a cost-reduction contract written by the US
Army Signal Corps with Collins Radio Corp. The R-390A was a great deal
cheaper per unit than the R-390. But the R-390A has the mechanical
filters, and THAT, sir, is the important difference! Every receiver, w/
the exception of the R8B, that I have owned I've had to supply either
a crystal lattice filter or a mechanical filter to supplement the
selectivity characteristics.

The lack of a good product detector and a good noise blanker are the
prime drawbacks of the R-390 family.

And the noise blanker of the R8B is "finicky" in that, if the incoming
signal is above a certain level, the NB ceases to operate. I think
that's because the R8B's NB has an AGC input to the NB.

Now go climb a tree!

Kindest regards,

Charles


Charles A Taylor, WD4INP
Greenville, North Carolina 


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx