Re: [IRCA] 1610 possiblties

["willis" <k4ape@xxxxxxxx>]

Here's a thought for everyone. Maybe it's Mt. Airy, NC. They had a CP for
1640 back in 2000. Maybe, they got an OK for 1610 instead of 1640? All the
Dfing seems to point to that area, or so. It would explain why I have them
S9+20 all day long. BUT it doesn't explain why Chris near Greenville, SC did
not hear them all day long.

Interesting mystery.
Willis
Old Fort, TN



----- Original Message -----
From: "R. F. Tetro" <rtetro@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "'Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America'"
<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] 1610 map


> I just checked with my field strength meter and compass again.  There is
> some Spanish speech in the background, which may be messing with my data
> a bit.  But here in SE PA the 1610 mystery station currently appears to
> be at 195 degrees True North with a field strength of about 0.125 mV/m.
>
> Rene F. Tetro
> Lansdale, PA, USA
> W2FIL, WPXG816, WPXU288
> Coordinates:  40D12'41"N  75D18'22"W
> Grid:  FN20IF
> Email:  rtetro@xxxxxxxxx
> Moderator:  www.radioveronica.us and www.dxhub.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bill Harms
> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 8:47 PM
> To: am@xxxxxxxxxxx; amdx@xxxxxxxxxx; 'Mailing list for the International
> Radio Club of America'
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] 1610 map
>
> Put me down as 190 - 10 with the caveat that I have a TIS within 1/2
> mile of me that might be messing up the bearing somewhat.
>
> Bill Harms
> Elkridge, Maryland
> N39 12 45   W76 42 50
>
> On 30 Nov 2006 at 20:07, Jim Tonne wrote:
>
> > Savannah now posted.  Looks like good data.
> > Used 35 degrees, Gil.
> >
> > - JimT
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx