Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] Re: 1350-CKDO has now pulled the plug
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] Re: 1350-CKDO has now pulled the plug



Barry McLarnon wrote:
> On Sunday 13 August 2006 22:24, Scott Fybush wrote:
>> I wouldn't call it especially "fat" - but I have an open carrier here in
>> Rochester on 1580 at 2224 EDT. I'll be rolling at 6 AM to hear the
>> sign-on, and may even get up to hear it live.
> 
> They're running oldies now, but their ID just before 2300 still had "107.7 FM 
> and 1350 AM".  They're about 10 dB weaker than WWKB and WQEW here, but that 
> still qualifies as HUGE.

I'm pretty certain that they're not running ND, then. I can hear them 
here in Rochester with the oldies, but the signal's easily nullable.

Here's my best guess as to what's been happening in the last couple of days:

When CKDO went ND on 1350, they probably disconnected the old 1350 
phasor and the antenna tuning units at the towers that weren't being 
used. That bought them a few days to retune those towers for 1580 and to 
begin connecting the new 1580 phasor.

Once 1350's ND signal left the air this morning, that would have been 
the time to retune that remaining tower for 1580.

What we're hearing now, first with dead carrier and now with audio, must 
be the tuning-up process for the new 1580 signal.

There's been no simulcast on 1350 and 1580 because there's just one set 
of transmission lines from the transmitter building to each tower, and 
no point spending the $$$ on the combiners and filters they'd need to 
install to send both 1350 and 1580 down that same set of lines.

I'd bet a pretty large chunk of CKDO's audience is over on the FM by now 
anyway, and will never even realize the AM has moved.

s
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx