Re: [IRCA] domestic dx

[Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx>]

Back in the '60s, the Asian and Australian DX was still on the 10 kHz 
channels, but there were also still clear channels, so domestic 
interference was not a big issue on a number of frequencies.

I think the only one I heard then was China on 1040, but at least in 
IRCA, DXers in California, and I think Seattle, heard others, using 
just air core loop antennas, and big iron communication receivers.

best wishes,

Nick




At 01:38 28-04-17, billy brooks wrote:
> Back in the mid-60's I was a novice dxr.  I also joined nrc.  At that time I
> don't recall ever seeing  ta/tp reports from anyone. They may have had a
> separate section
> To list those regions.  I just don't remember, nor do I have old newsletters
> to reference.
> I grew up only thinking ta/tp were relegated to the swl hobby.
> I hope we can expand on this issue of soils conductivity vs. domestic dx and
> the potential for great dx in less than ideal circumstances.
>
> Bill brooks          drake r8a   wellbrook ala1530lnp   Paleozoic shale
> (soils are significant!)
> Waynesburg,pa
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IRCA [mailto:irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of billy brooks
> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 12:21 PM
> To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [IRCA] domestic dx
>
> Glad to see a little domestic dx being offered  up.  While interesting,  the
> ta/tp stuff does get a bit pedantic at times.  Not criticizing, just sayin'.
>
> And while I'm steeping on toes,  would like to see more qth and equip.
> included with folks' reports. Helps with the mileage thing.
>
>
>
> Bill brooks,           drake r8a,    wellbrook  ala1530lnp,     Paleozoic
> shale
>
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of 
> the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Nick Hall-Patch
Victoria, BC
Canada 

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx