[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] 3" FSL Tecsun PL-380 TP-DX Recordings for 3-11 (Cont.)
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] 3" FSL Tecsun PL-380 TP-DX Recordings for 3-11 (Cont.)
- From: Chuck Hutton <charlesh3@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 20:31:13 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Authentication-results: hard-core-dx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; hard-core-dx.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=msn.com;
- Content-language: en-US
- Delivered-to: archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
- Thread-index: AQHRfUsoPc4ROe+tukCrDoaSQIMFcZ9XyF8AgAAI3yQ=
- Thread-topic: [IRCA] 3" FSL Tecsun PL-380 TP-DX Recordings for 3-11 (Cont.)
Hi Gary:
Wenatchee is about 77 degrees and Seoul about 310. So why not just null KPQ? That puts Seoul very close to the peak of the antenna.
Chuck
________________________________________
From: IRCA <irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx <d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 7:49 PM
To: America, Mailing
Subject: Re: [IRCA] 3" FSL Tecsun PL-380 TP-DX Recordings for 3-11 (Cont.)
Hi Nick,
<CLIP>
Actually 558-HLQH has had pretty good signal strength here as well, Nick, but it suffers greatly from 560-KPQ splatter at this location. As you are aware the ferrite-based antennas have no back side rejection here such as they would at a solid rock ocean cliff location like Rockwork, and even with the modest DSP selectivity currently offered in Ultralight radios the signal from 558-HLQH routinely gets plastered by KPQ splatter here.
<CLIP>
73, Gary
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nick Hall-Patch" <nhp@xxxxxxxx>
To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America" <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 10:09:15 AM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] 3" FSL Tecsun PL-380 TP-DX Recordings for 3-11 (Cont.)
Hi Gary,
Do you receive HLQH-558 particularly at your
location? I've been finding this season that
HLQH is usually considerably more readable than
HLSA-603 here, as if the latter is
undermodulated. I don't think there is a new
noise source around 600kHz drowning it out.
You've usually had better signals overall on the
low band Asians, but I haven't seen much mention of HLQH.
best wishes,
Nick
At 11:29 12-03-16, you wrote:
>.......The MP3 of 603-HLSA at 1337 was far and
>away the best signal that this tiny stand-alone
>model has ever received from the station..... 603Â HLSA Namyang, S. KoreaÂ
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx