[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] Wellbrook Large Aperture Loop Antenna ALA100LN
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] Wellbrook Large Aperture Loop Antenna ALA100LN
- From: Walter Salmaniw <canswl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 01:39:01 +0000
- Delivered-to: archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=DQFZ6U1PTQqc2oiib5b0muTLECR7hf7E6V/ToFacKx8=; b=ziyp0V1Rrutsm1NI+VuPkVY+GuF7ICIz4OWrVUvjZ56E8AEg358PNJpQUumuLwZ915 np5iFNEB2QVjAAc1J7ElW/NFZtWABTrOvgEl22Rvg4VEu3iPROTALIM66HmWtR8G5gS9 JHgVt+/xVLeGUiDIghvQo+bjgjgD9gCGRAjzHQWlJdrakhmxN4scjfcRLY7qvPsgC70+ KFK/hiZaxN7beE4zJXzlavcsyY210I3FPKkiCE0TNJuIPIwfrWgnC0H72XzEc/tCMlZd Lfeaq/X/naZBXLU8GvgBDcg+c47OELLx+rJ3Fi5NfoJPdJz50DjPDKrLs7J5jomTMWQ7 EBfg==
Les, you will have no issues with signal strength. The ALA 100 works very
well this way, but, the bigger the loop, the more signal you will have.
Mine are from 20' circumference to well over 100'. I remember my first try
was with a small loop of perhaps 10' around, and I wasn't impressed. Big
is better! Walt
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 12:56 AM, Les Rayburn <les@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Walter,
>
> I have an ALA1530 S+ that performs well, but again with low signal levels
> overall. S/N ratio is great and I get really good bi-directional nulls with
> this antenna on a rotor.
>
> Hoping the ALA100LN will provide more signal level that the Flag Iâm using
> now.
>
> Donât think the bi-directional nature of the antenna will be an issue.
> With the exception of flamethrowers like WSB 750 in Atlanta, I donât have a
> high number of pests to the East that are blocking reception of desired
> stations in the West. The âproblem childrenâ tend to be more North of my
> location, or South with Cubans.
>
> Fingers crossed.
>
> 73,
>
>
> Les Rayburn, director
> High Noon Media Services
> 130 1st Avenue West
> Alabaster, AL 35007-8536
> 205-621-7500
> 205-621-7505 FAX
> 205-253-4867 CELL
> highnoonfilm.com
>
> [This message and any attached documents contain information from the
> sender that may be confidential and/or privileged. If you are not the
> intended recipient please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and
> then delete this message. Thank you.]
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 2, 2016, at 6:48 PM, Walter Salmaniw <canswl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Les, I have many ALA 100s and FLG 100s. It's not quite so easy as what
> > everyone says, though. Don't forget they are Bi-directional. If that's
> an
> > issue, it may pose problems for you. Apart from that, I can't argue with
> > any of the other comments. Wellbrook makes premium products. ....Walt
> > Salmaniw
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Les Rayburn <les@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Just ordered the North American version of the Wellbrook Large Aperture
> >> Loop Antenna ALA-100LN. Iâd like to hear from other users on the list
> who
> >> have used this antenna for MW DXing.
> >>
> >> Iâm going to replace the termination and feed point portions of a âFlagâ
> >> antenna that I have mounted on wooden poles at the edge of my property..
> It
> >> favors the West, but even with a pre-amp the signal levels are low.
> Hoping
> >> for stronger signals from the ALA100LN.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 73,
> >>
> >> Les Rayburn, N1LF
> >> Marlene, AL
> >> EM63nf
> >>
> >> Member WTFDA, IRCA, NRC. Former CPC Chairman for NRC & IRCA.
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> IRCA mailing list
> >> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >>
> >> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> >> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> >> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >>
> >> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >>
> >> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx