[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[IRCA] TP 12 Dec Victoria version



The signal strength monitor said that 1200-1300UT was fairly lively this morning, unfortunately, the recorder wasn't set for that time. Otherwise 774 was the most likely to deliver a signal, but very often wasn't there at all. A bit of a sunrise enhancement 1535-1540UT, but that was mostly carriers.

pretty darn good audio (all of it understandable by a native speaker, at least briefly):

774 JOUB defying Murphy by peaking across 1200UT, woman in clear Japanese after the pips. Its half-hearted return didn't start until 1440UT, but it defied Murphy again with a clear "JOUB NHK....hoso" before anthem and music box after 1540UT. Have to tune up my Japanese, as it didn't really sound like "NHK dai ni hoso" that I was expecting.




Reasonable audio at times during the period (much of it understandable by a native speaker, though often battling w/splash or noise):

1566 HLAZ I'm sure this is pushing it, but it was definitely a man in Chinese 1534UT, but with erratic fades; probably at this level on peaks



not so reasonable audio, occasional words or phrases in splash or noise could be understood by a native speaker:

747 JOIB man and woman in Japanese, //774




Burbles in the splatter and noise (if lucky, language might be guessed at by cadence of talk, or parallel established by changes in talk or music)

828 JOBB woman in Japanese //774 1443UT
891 NHK pips, man talking, Japanese inflection; 594 wasn't there, but its brief snippets of audio sounded like this but did not coincide
972 woman talking , maybe Korean 1447UT
1287 pop vocal music, 1547UT very weak for about 30 seconds




Strongish het, no or "near imaginary" audio (either undermodulated or ravaged by splatter)

738 873 1575 1593



best wishes,

Nick

_______________________________________________

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx