[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] PL-360?
Stephen:
I have two PL-606 receivers. With the bandwidth set to six I'd say they're closer to five kiloHertz. It is slightly narrower than the PL-310 when it's set to six. I
hardly ever listen with the PL-310 or PL-606 set at six, normally three or less.
Richard.
------- Original Message -------
>From : Stephen Airy[mailto:pianoplayer88key@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent : 2/17/2012 4:52:14 PM
To : irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc :
Subject : RE: Re: [IRCA] PL-360?
Hi Richard,
I've noticed that my PL-606's "6" kHz bandwidth is actually more like a "4". If I tune 5 or more kHz off in that setting I get the distorted off-tune audio, and the
signal strength "dBµ" meter drops off much more than it would if I was still within the bandwidth. Also when viewing a recording of a station in a computer editing
program on a graph (one that shows dB on the vertical axis and Hz on the horizontal axis - what kind of graph is that?) there is very little if any energy much
above 4 kHz, even on non-IBOC stations that I know (using other wider-bandwidth radios) broadcast out to 10 kHz or more. (In spite of this, it's not a particularly
sharp / total cutoff above the bandwidth - I have to go down to the 1 kHz (or maybe 2 kHz) setting before the top piano notes (around 4 kHz) in music that has
piano on my local Family Radio religious station are inaudible, although at 2 or 3 kHz they are much weaker than in the 6 - i mean 4 kHz
bandwidth.) Does yours behave like that too, or is it just mine?
73,
Stephen
________________________________
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx