Re: [IRCA] RG11

["Craig Healy" <bubba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>> Another test I made is making a balun for each end and using CAT5
>> ethernet network cable.  It's balanced and gathers less noise or
>> unwanted signals on the way in.  Also cheap and very easy to build. 
>
> I would second the Cat 5e approach.  I've done a number of controlled
> tests and it outperforms RG-58 hands down, MW thru 10 meters, for
> noise performance and signal loss.

Have you tried using it for more than one feed?  I did make a 1X4 balun set so I could send four individual signals through it.  Worked just as well.

Example: http://www.mcmelectronics.com/product/50-7769

> With shorter runs (50 feet or so) I haven't needed baluns.

Haven't tried that.  Seemed just as easy to add a toroid balun to the adapter box.  RJ-45 plugs make it dead simple.

Craig Healy
Providence, RI





_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx